DIAGNOSIS OF NONPALPABLE BREAST CANCER IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-1-5-16
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the possibilities of standard and additional methods for X-ray mammography (MG) in the comprehensive diagnosis of nonpalpable breast masses and preclinical cancers; to identify the important radiological signs of malignancy as predictors for the application of multislice spiral computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (MSCT/MRI-MG), as well as invasive studies in premenopausal women.
Material and methods. The investigation enrolled 423 pre-menopausal patients with nonpalpable breast masses; 129 women were found to have breast cancer. The diagnosis was verified by comprehensive clinical and instrumental examination using standard and additional methods for X-ray mammography, ultra-sonography, MRI, MSCT of the breast and biopsy. Significant radiological signs of malignancy of the lesions were detected and their diagnostic value was identified.
Results. The use of additional diagnostic techniques for mammography contributes to the confident visualization of important radiological criteria for malignancy, enhances the informative value of by 5%, and promotes a decline in the number of unjustified biopsies by 11%.
Conclusion. Problems in visualizing and categorizing nonpalpable breast masses necessitate additional diagnostic techniques for X-ray mammography. The identification and confident interpretation of important radiological criteria for benign or malignant lesions increase the diagnostic value of X-ray mammography: the sensitivity from 91% to 98%, specificity from 61% to 75%. MSCT-MG and MRI-MG demonstrate even higher efficiency: contrast-enhanced (CE) MSCT–MG (100% sensitivity, 99% specificity) and CE MRI–MG (100% sensitivity, 98% specificity). Sequential radiological and morphological studies improve the quality and efficiency of diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.
About the Authors
N. V. NudnovRussian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Deputy Director for Science
E. V. Novikova
Russian Federation
Assistant of the Department, Radiologist
References
1. Rozhkova N.I. X-ray diagnostics in mammalogy: Guide. Moscow: Spetsial’noe Izdatel’stvo Meditsinskikh Knig; 2014 (in Russ.).
2. Shakh B.A., Fundaro D.M., Man-dava S. Radiological diagnosis of breast diseases. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya Znaniy; 2014 (in Russ.).
3. Semiglazov V.F., Manikhas G.M., Zakharova N.A. ROOM. Clinical guidelines for screening of breast cancer; 2015. http://breastcancer-society.ru/rek/view/201 (accessed15 August 2015) (in Russ.).
4. Kaprin A.D., Rozhkovа N.I. Mammalogy: National leadership. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016 (in Russ.).
5. Fisher W., Baum F., Lyuftner-Nagel S. Breast Disease. Radiodiagnosis. Moscow: Medpressinform; 2009 (in Russ.).
6. Mitina L.A., Fisenko E.P., Kazakevich V.I., Zabolotskaya N.V. Radial diagnostics of breast pathology using the BI-RADS system. Oncologiya (Oncology, Russian journal); 2013; 3: 17–20 (in Russ.).
7. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS. Atlas. 5th ed. 2013. URL: http://www.acr.org/ ~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/ QualitySafety/ Resources/ BIRADS/ (дата обращения 12.08.2015).
8. Colin C., Prince V., Valette P.J. Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer? Eur. J. Radiol. 2013; 82 (3): 404–11.
9. Sinitsin V.E. (ed.) ACR. BI-RADS. Mammography. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data (BI-RADS). 5th ed. Moscow: Medpraktika-M; 2010 (in Russ.).
10. Korzhenkova G.P. Verification of non-palpable breast cancer formations on the preoperative stage. Radiologiya–Praktika (Radiology– Practice, Russian journal). 2013; 2: 16–24 (in Russ.).
11. Afanas’eva S.S., Popova T.N., Zhandarova L.F. Features of morphological verification of the diagnosis of breast cancer. Saratovskiy Nauchno-Meditsinskiy Zhurnal (Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research, Russian journal). 2008; 4 (2): 44–7 (in Russ.).
12. Chung C., Giess C., Birdwell R. et al. Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions. AJR. 2014; 202 (4): 922–7.
13. Cheng L., Li X. Breast Imaging Reporting and DataSystem (BI-RADS): Breast mass. Gland Surg. J. 2012; 1 (1): 62–74.
14. Smetherman D., Fathi Gowharji L. Clinical images: radial scar of the breast. Ochsner J.2015; 15 (3): 219–22.
Review
For citations:
Nudnov N.V., Novikova E.V. DIAGNOSIS OF NONPALPABLE BREAST CANCER IN PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2017;98(1):5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-1-5-16