Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta with manual operation of contrast agent injection in interventional radiology

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-3-165-172

Abstract

Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta in interventional radiology are described. The issues concerning the selection of the optimal contrast agent during angiography and endovascular interventions are considered. It is concluded that contrast enhancement with iopromide and automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta should be considered as reliable, highly effective and safe imaging technique in the diagnosis and X-ray surgery in cardiovascular diseases, malformations, tumors and other patology

About the Authors

A. G. Osiev
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Ministry of Health of the Moscow region, ul. Shchepkina, 61/2, korpus 1, Moscow, 129110, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of Department of Roentgen Surgery of the Heart and Vessels


N. L. Shimanovskii
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the RF, ul. Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of P.V. Sergeev Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Radiobiology



References

1. Sandhu K., Nadar S.K. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015; 199: 342–55.

2. Shimanovskii N.L. Contrast agents. Guide rational use. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009: 463 (in Russ.).

3. Polyaev Yu.A., Garbuzov R.V. Use of automatic injector MARK V PRO VIS (MEDRAD) for endovascular interventions in children. Diagnosticheskaya i Interventsionnaya Radiologiya. 2009; 3 (2): 47–54 (in Russ.).

4. Kaluski E., Moussa I.D., Heuser R. R., Kern M.J. Automated contrast injectors for angiography: Devices, methodology, and safety. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009; 74: 459–64.

5. Avanta™ Fluid Management Injection System. Available at: http:// www.radiologysolutions.bayer.com/products/angiography/injection/avanta/

6. Karmazanovskii G.G., Polyaev Yu.A., Yudin A.L., Shimanovskii N.L. Modern contrast media and nefropathy: How to decrease the risk of renal failure? Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya. 2007; 1: 135–44 (in Russ.)

7. Brunette J., Mongrain R., Roders-Cabau J., Larose E., Leask R., Bertrand O.F. Comparative rheology of low- and iso-osmolarity contrast agents at different temperatures. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008; 71: 78–83.

8. Halsell R.D. Heating contrast media: Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology. 1987; 164: 276–8.

9. Wildberger J.E., Mahnken A.H., Seidensticker P.R. Aorto-peripheral MDCT angiography: Implications for contrast medium delivery. Imaging Decisions. 2007; 4: 8–12.

10. Scutt C. Generic achievable space results. Indianola: Medrad Ltd. Publication; 2008.

11. Call J., Sacrinty M., Applegate R., Little W., Santos R., Baki T. et al. Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: Effects on contrast-induced nephropathy. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2006; 18: 469–74.

12. Begg R.J., Lins J.A., Kalenak G., Beltz R., Padezanin-Sklack D. Managing contrast injections during diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Diagnosticheskaya i Interventsionnaya Radiologiya. 2009; 3 (10): 41–5 (in Russ.)

13. Larsen A.S., Ostera°s B.H. Step back from the patient: Reduction of radiation

14. dose to the operator by the systematic use of an automatic power injector for contrast media in an interventional angiography suite. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53 (3): 330–4.

15. Durst R., Lotan C., Nassar H., Gotsman M., Mor E., Varshitzki B. et al. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: Real-world modeling. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2007; 9: 290–3.

16. Anne G., Gruberg L., Huber A., Nikolsky E., Grenadier E., Boulus M. et al. Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: Comparison of the contrast volume delivered. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2004; 16 (7): 360–2.


Review

For citations:


Osiev A.G., Shimanovskii N.L. Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta with manual operation of contrast agent injection in interventional radiology. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2016;97(3):165-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-3-165-172

Views: 1290


ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)