Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta with manual operation of contrast agent injection in interventional radiology
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-3-165-172
Abstract
Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta in interventional radiology are described. The issues concerning the selection of the optimal contrast agent during angiography and endovascular interventions are considered. It is concluded that contrast enhancement with iopromide and automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta should be considered as reliable, highly effective and safe imaging technique in the diagnosis and X-ray surgery in cardiovascular diseases, malformations, tumors and other patology
About the Authors
A. G. OsievRussian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of Department of Roentgen Surgery of the Heart and Vessels
N. L. Shimanovskii
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Corresponding Member of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of P.V. Sergeev Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Radiobiology
References
1. Sandhu K., Nadar S.K. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015; 199: 342–55.
2. Shimanovskii N.L. Contrast agents. Guide rational use. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009: 463 (in Russ.).
3. Polyaev Yu.A., Garbuzov R.V. Use of automatic injector MARK V PRO VIS (MEDRAD) for endovascular interventions in children. Diagnosticheskaya i Interventsionnaya Radiologiya. 2009; 3 (2): 47–54 (in Russ.).
4. Kaluski E., Moussa I.D., Heuser R. R., Kern M.J. Automated contrast injectors for angiography: Devices, methodology, and safety. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009; 74: 459–64.
5. Avanta™ Fluid Management Injection System. Available at: http:// www.radiologysolutions.bayer.com/products/angiography/injection/avanta/
6. Karmazanovskii G.G., Polyaev Yu.A., Yudin A.L., Shimanovskii N.L. Modern contrast media and nefropathy: How to decrease the risk of renal failure? Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya. 2007; 1: 135–44 (in Russ.)
7. Brunette J., Mongrain R., Roders-Cabau J., Larose E., Leask R., Bertrand O.F. Comparative rheology of low- and iso-osmolarity contrast agents at different temperatures. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008; 71: 78–83.
8. Halsell R.D. Heating contrast media: Role in contemporary angiography. Radiology. 1987; 164: 276–8.
9. Wildberger J.E., Mahnken A.H., Seidensticker P.R. Aorto-peripheral MDCT angiography: Implications for contrast medium delivery. Imaging Decisions. 2007; 4: 8–12.
10. Scutt C. Generic achievable space results. Indianola: Medrad Ltd. Publication; 2008.
11. Call J., Sacrinty M., Applegate R., Little W., Santos R., Baki T. et al. Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: Effects on contrast-induced nephropathy. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2006; 18: 469–74.
12. Begg R.J., Lins J.A., Kalenak G., Beltz R., Padezanin-Sklack D. Managing contrast injections during diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures. Diagnosticheskaya i Interventsionnaya Radiologiya. 2009; 3 (10): 41–5 (in Russ.)
13. Larsen A.S., Ostera°s B.H. Step back from the patient: Reduction of radiation
14. dose to the operator by the systematic use of an automatic power injector for contrast media in an interventional angiography suite. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53 (3): 330–4.
15. Durst R., Lotan C., Nassar H., Gotsman M., Mor E., Varshitzki B. et al. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: Real-world modeling. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2007; 9: 290–3.
16. Anne G., Gruberg L., Huber A., Nikolsky E., Grenadier E., Boulus M. et al. Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: Comparison of the contrast volume delivered. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2004; 16 (7): 360–2.
Review
For citations:
Osiev A.G., Shimanovskii N.L. Advantages of automatic injector MEDRAD® Avanta with manual operation of contrast agent injection in interventional radiology. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2016;97(3):165-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2016-97-3-165-172