Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

Focal Artifacts and Extraorgan Findings in Pulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2026-107-1-6-16

Abstract

Objective: to clarify and systematize the causes of focal and non-organ artifacts capable of acting as diagnostic pitfalls in lung perfusion scintigraphy using 99mTc macroaggregated albumin (MAA), as well as their semiotics, principles, and methods for differentiating from pathological changes.

Material and methods. The outcomes of lung perfusion scintigraphy were analyzed in 1,025 patients who underwent examinations to rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) or thromboembolic factors contributing to diagnosed pulmonary hypertension. The procedure was carried out in a multiplanar mode using twodetector single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanners while the patient was lying supine, 4–5 minutes after intravenous injection of a radiopharmaceutical (RPh) with an activity level of 111–148 MBq. Lung images were captured in six projections, including anterior, posterior, and four oblique planes. If required, additional screening was performed in combined SPECT/CT mode. The term “artifact” was used to describe isolated perfusion defects that simulate PE, as well as extrapulmonary findings resembling signs of a right-to-left shunt.

Results. Artefact scintigraphic findings corresponding to the above criteria were found in 634 (61.8%) patients. Focal changes (n=618) were classified into “cold” and “hot” based on their scintigraphic presentation. Single “cold” lesions (n=611) were most commonly due to the shielding effect of altered anatomical structures (heart – 493, pulmonary artery trunk – 72, pleural effusion and elevated diaphragm – 41), as well as implanted pacemakers (n=5). “Hot spot” (n=7) obscured thromboembolic perfusion defects because of their high specific radioactivity. The main reason for this artifact is blood ingress into a syringe with 99mTc-MAA during intravenous administration of RPh. Extrapulmonary signs of right-to-left shunt were observed in 14 patients with congenital heart defects and were characterized by concurrent visualization of the kidneys and other organs in the systemic circulation (spleen, liver, thyroid gland). The reason for artefactual intestinal imaging (n=2) was residual radioactivity following prior myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with 99mTc methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile.

Conclusion. Examining the reasons behind the occurrence of focal and extra-organ artifact findings in lung perfusion scintigraphy, as well as associated diagnostic and interpretive pitfalls, will enable the development of an appropriate quality control strategy to reduce the likelihood of false-positive interpretations of PE and systemic pulmonary shunts.

About the Authors

S. P. Mironov
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation

Sergey P. Mironov - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Radiologist, Laboratory of Radioisotope Diagnostics and Therapy, Department of Radionuclide Diagnostics and Positron Emission Tomography.

Ul. Akademika Chazova, 15a, Moscow, 121552



M. Е. Bugriy
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation

Мikhail Е. Bugriy - Head of Positron Emission Laboratory, Department of Radionuclide Diagnostics and Positron Emission Tomography.

Ul. Akademika Chazova, 15a, Moscow, 121552



V. B. Sergienko
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology, National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation

Vladimir B. Sergienko - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Advisor, Department of Coordination of Scientific, Medical and Educational Programs.

Ul. Akademika Chazova, 15a, Moscow, 121552



References

1. Zöphel K, Bacher-Stier C, Pinkert J, Kropp J. Ventilation/ perfusion lung scintigraphy: what is steel need? A review considering technetium-99m-labelled macro-aggregates of albumin. Ann Nucl Med. 2009; 23(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0187-3.

2. Muller JH, Rossier PH. A new method for the treatment of cancer of the lungs by means of artificial radioactivity. Acta Radiol. 1951; 35(5-6): 449–68. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016925109136677.

3. Ernst H, Iglauer E, Kronschwitz H, Spode E. Experimental animal studies of the therapy of lung tumors using radioactive goldcarbon suspension. Strahlentherapie. 1958; 107(3): 382–90 (in German).

4. Taplin GV, MacDonald NS. Radiochemistry of macroaggregated albumin and newer lung scanning agents. Semin Nucl Med. 1971; 1(2): 132–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2998(71)81013-9.

5. Harper PV, Lathrop KA, Jiminez F, et al. Technetium 99m as a scanning agent. Radiology. 1965; 85: 101–9. https://doi.org/10.1148/85.1.101.

6. Panchenko EP, Balahonova TV, Danilov NM, et al. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism. Eurasian Association of Cardiology (EAC) clinical practice guidelines (2021). Eurasian Heart Journal. 2021; 1: 44–77 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2021-1-44-77.

7. Avdeev SN, Barbarash OL, Valieva ZS, et al. 2024 Clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary hypertension, including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2024; 29(11): 6161 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-6161.

8. PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990; 263(20): 2753–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440200057023.

9. Wells LD. Radionuclide imaging artifacts. Chicago Year Book Medical Publishers; 1980: 134 pp.

10. Moser KM, Miale A. Interpretive pitfalls in lung photoscanning. Am J Med. 1968; 44(3): 366–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(68)90108-3.

11. Schembri GP, Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Freeman L. Artifacts and anatomical variants affecting ventilation and perfusion lung imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2015; 45(5): 373–91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.02.009.

12. Rubin MP, Kuleshova OD, Chechurin RE. Radionuclide perfusion scintigraphy of the lungs: research methodology and interpretation of results. Radiology — Practice. 2002; 4: 16–21 (in Russ).

13. Ansheles AA, Sergienko VB. Nuclear cardiology. Мoscow: National Medical Research Center for Cardiology; 2021: 516 pp (in Russ).

14. Wallace JM, Moser KM, Hartman MT, Ashburn WL. Patterns of pulmonary perfusion scans in normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981; 124(4): 480-3. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1981.124.4.480.

15. Fedullo PF, Kapitan KS, Brewer NS, et al. Patterns of pulmonary perfusion scans in normal subjects. IV. The prevalence of abnormal scans in smokers 30 to 49 years of age. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 139(5): 1155–7. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/139.5.1155.

16. Arkhipova OA, Martynyuk TV, Samoilenko LE, et al. Perfusion lung scintigraphy in patients with a pulmonary hypertension of a various etiology. Eurasian Heart Journal. 2015; 4: 20–5 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2015-4-20-25.

17. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. The stripe sign: a new sign for diagnosis of nonembolic defects on pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1982; 142(3): 737–41. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.142.3.7063693.

18. Kotlyarov EV, Ruppel WF, Reba RC. Interpretation of perfusion lung scan based on presence and absence of “stripe sign”. Invest Radiol. 1983; 18(4): S15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198307000-00081.

19. Korobkova IK, Lazutkina VK, Nizovtsova LA, Riden TV. Radiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension: methodical aspects. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2015; 4: 46–53 (in Russ).

20. Mettler FA, Guiberiteau MJ. Essential of nuclear medicine. imaging. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012: 624 pp.

21. Kalashnikov AV, Salimov DSh. Current views on the problem of abdominal and pleural adhesions: etiology, pathologic manifestations, similarity and differences, disputable issues of prevention. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2018; 2(1): 27–35 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg20182127-35.

22. Fogelman I, Clarke S, Cook G, Gnanasegaran G (Eds). Atlas of clinical nuclear medicine. CRC Press; 2014: 1607 pp.

23. Schuster DM, Scheidt K. Artifactual perfusion defect from a hypertrophic first costosternal articulation. Clin Nucl Med. 1997; 22(9): 642. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-199709000-00017.

24. Shesternya PA, Vasileva AO, Shkil LM, et al. Syndrome Tietze – interdisciplinary clinical case. Siberian Medical Review. 2017; 2: 112–6 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.20333/2500136-2017-2-112-116.

25. Duffy GJ, DeNardo GL, Abington RB. Origin and evolution of radioactive pulmonary emboli in man. Radiology. 1968; 91: 1175–80.

26. Preston DF, Greenlaw R. “Hotspots” in lung scans. J Nucl Med. 1970; 11(7): 422–5.

27. Lutzker LG, Perez LA. Radioactive embolization from upperextremity thrombophlebitis. J Nucl Med. 1975; 16: 241–2.

28. Ikehira H, Kinjo M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Hot spots observed on pulmonary perfusion imaging: a case report. J Nucl Med Technol. 1999; 27(4): 301–2.

29. Sebbar C, Hiroual S, Kouassi N, et al. Artifactual hot spots on technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin perfusion lung scan. Indian J Nucl Med. 2023; 38(2): 151–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_182_22.

30. Hussain R, Maseeh-uz-Zaman, Khan SA, Ahmad MN. Extra [corrected] pulmonary uptake of Tc-99m-MAA perfusion lung scan as a result of right to left intra cardiac shunt. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006; 56(5): 241–2.

31. Mitsui K, Woodhams R, Ukisu R, Inoue Y. Lung perfusion scintigraphy in eisenmenger syndrome due to patent ductus arteriosus. Clin Nucl Med. 2019; 44(11): 879–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002735.

32. Son HJ, Ryu JS. 99mTc-MAA total body imaging of patent rightto-left shunt with invisible brain activity. Hell J Nucl Med. 2020; 23(2): 209–10.

33. Gale B, Chen C, Chun KJ, et al. Systemic to pulmonary venous shunting in superior vena cava obstruction. Unusual myocardial and thyroid visualization. Clin Nucl Med. 1990; 15(4): 246–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-199004000-00008.

34. Marashdeh W, Wahl RL. Case report: brown fat accumulation of tc-99m macroaggregated albumin in a lung perfusion study in a patient with multiple lung arteriovenous malformations and right-to-left shunting. Medicine. 2015; 94(42): e1820. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001820.

35. D'Abadie P, Ghaye B, Jamar F. Vertebral uptake of 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin during lung perfusion scanning. World J Nucl Med. 2019; 19(3): 271–2. https://doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_44_19.

36. Esser JP, Oei HY, de Bruin HG, Krenning EP. Liver and vertebral uptake of Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin (MAA). Clin Nucl Med. 2004; 29(12): 793–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-200412000-00004.

37. Rikhsiev AZ, Sadikov II, Zikirov M. A method for obtaining a kit for the technetium-99m generator based on macroaggregated albumin (MAA) with divalent tin, for the preparation of a diagnostic agent. Universum: Chemistry and Biology: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2024; 4(118) (in Russ).

38. Campeau RJ, Lichtenstein RJ, Ward TL, Alster DK. Incidental detection of hyperthyroidism during a perfusion lung scan for suspected pulmonary emboli. Clin Nucl Med. 1991; 16(4): 251–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-199104000-00009.

39. Hung JC, Ponto JA, Hammes RJ. Radiopharmaceutical-related pitfalls and artifacts. Semin Nucl Med. 1996; 26(4): 208–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2998(96)80002-x.

40. Ajdari SE, Qutbi M. Rapid decomposition of 99mTc-MAA complex during lung perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2019; 44(8): 674–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002643.

41. Kodina GE, Malysheva AO. Quality control of radiopharmaceuticals in medical institutions. Drug Development & Registration. 2017; 1: 88–92 (in Russ).

42. Zolotnitskaya VP. Diagnosis of arteriovenous blood shunting in the lungs by means of perfusion scintigraphy in clinical practice and experiment. Regional Blood Circulation and Microcirculation. 2011; 10(4): 49–53 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.24884/1682-6655-2011-10-4-49-53.


Review

For citations:


Mironov S.P., Bugriy M.Е., Sergienko V.B. Focal Artifacts and Extraorgan Findings in Pulmonary Perfusion Scintigraphy. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2026;107(1):6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2026-107-1-6-16

Views: 130

JATS XML

ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)