The Use of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (PET-CT) with 11C-L-Methionine in the Diagnosis of Glial Tumors
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2025-106-5-152-162
Abstract
Background. Primary brain tumor lesions include gliomas, which, according to epidemiological data, make up about 30% of all tumors of the central nervous system and are the most common. Overall and relapse-free survival rates depend on the degree of glioma malignancy and the histopathological nature of the detected lesion. For better treatment and prognosis, it is necessary to determine the exact location and histopathological nature of the tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the method of choice for structural brain assessment, but even with the use of contrast enhancement (CE), it does not always allow for reliable differentiation between tumor progression and post-therapeutic changes (radionecrosis, postoperative scars, cysts, inflammation) in patients after antitumor treatment. Radiopharmaceuticals, in particular 11C-L-methionine, provide an assessment of tumor amino acid metabolism and complement structural data, increasing diagnostic accuracy. MRI, positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) with 11C-L-methionine in combination with morphological examination of the sample after stereotactic biopsy have shown high efficiency in the diagnosis of gliomas with varying degrees of malignancy.
Objective: to study the possibilities of applying PET-CT with 11C-L-methionine in the diagnosis of continued growth and recurrence of glial tumors, as well as to conduct differential diagnostics with postoperative non-neoplastic changes.
Material and methods. A retrospective, descriptive, analytical study was conducted in the Department of Radionuclide Therapy and Diagnostics of the Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological) named after N.P. Napalkov. It included 67 patients (34 men and 33 women aged 17 to 75 years, mean age was 43.5±15.6 years) for whom PET-CT was carried out in the period from 2007 to 2015 after neurosurgical treatment with suspected continued growth of glial tumors. All patients underwent CE-MRI and CE-CT. Correlation coefficient (r) was used to estimate the level of dependence between PET-CT data.
Results. In 55% of the cases, continued growth of high-grade gliomas (Grades IV and III) was detected. In these patients, the radiopharmaceutical accumulation index ranged from 1.3 to 5.1, with mean value 2.9±0.85. In patients with continued growth of benign astrocytomas, the degree of 11C-L-methionine accumulation varied with mean value 1.6±0.51. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT in detecting brain glioma progression were 92.3% and 73.3%, respectively. The combination of CE-MRI and PET-CT provided a sensitivity of 96.1% in diagnosing glioma tumor progression. The results show that MRI and PET-CT data are consistent in 45 of 48 cases (92.8%) of proven glioma progression. An accumulation index greater than 2 can predict continuous growth of malignant glioma with 95% accuracy, and the threshold for differentiating benign glioma from inflammatory lesions is 0.9.
Conclusion. Although PET-CT has good sensitivity in differentiating postoperative lesions in patients with glioma, CE-MRI is necessary for localized and earlier diagnosis. The lack of visualization of avascular gliomas is one of the limitations of PET-CT, although CE-MRI does not exclude them.
About the Authors
A. Z. ToligiРоссия
Angelo Z. Toligi, Clinical Resident in Radiology, Chair of Oncology and Radiology named after V.P. Kharchenko, Medical Institute
ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, Moscow, 117198
E. M. Zykov
Россия
Evgeny M. Zykov, Cand. Med. Sc., Radiologist, Head of Isotope Research Laboratory
ul. Leningradskaya, 68А, lit. А, Pesochny Settlement, Saint Petersburg, 197758
A. R. Semenova
Россия
Angelina R. Semenova, Clinical Resident in Radiology
ul. Profsoyuznaya, 86, Moscow, 117997
S. P. Aksenova
Россия
Svetlana P. Aksenova, Cand. Med. Sc., Researcher, X-ray Radiology Laboratory, Research Department of Complex Diagnostics of Diseases and Radiotherapy; Associate Professor, Chair of Oncology and Radiology
ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, Moscow, 117198;
ul. Profsoyuznaya, 86, Moscow, 117997
N. V. Nudnov
Россия
Nikolay V. Nudnov, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific Work, Professor, Chair of Oncology and Roentgenology; Deputy Director for Scientific Work, Head of Research Department of Complex Diagnostics of Diseases and Radiotherapy; Professor, Chair of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, Moscow, 117198;
ul. Profsoyuznaya, 86, Moscow, 117997;
ul. Barrikadnaya, 2/1, str. 1, Moscow, 125993
M. V. Podolskaya
Россия
Maria V. Podolskaya, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Oncology and Radiology named after V.P. Kharchenko, Medical Institute
ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, Moscow, 117198
References
1. Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO (Eds) Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (incidence and mortality). Мoscow: Herzen Moscow Research Institute of Oncology – branch of National Medical Research Center of Radiology; 2022: 252 pp (in Russ).
2. Gormolysova EV, Chernov SV, Dmitriev AB, et al. The surgical treatment of brain metastases. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014; 4: 87–91 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2014-0-4-87-91.
3. Pouchieu C, Lacour B, Delafosse P, et al. National estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in metropolitan France between 1990 and 2018. Vol. 1: Solid tumors / Central nervous system. 2019 (in French).
4. Ishmatov RF, Midlenko AI, Ryabov SYu, et al. Brain tumors in the Ulyanovsk Region (analysis of epidemiological indicators and the state of the neuro-oncology service). Contemporary Problems of Science and Education. 2015; 1-1 (in Russ).
5. Kit OI, Ignatov SN, Zlatnik EYu, et al. Role of cytokines in the formation of immunological microenvironment in low-grade brain gliomas, their significance for diagnosis and immunotherapy. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2021; 16(4): 433–8 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2021.16106.
6. Danilov GV, Kalayeva DB, Vikhrova NB, et al. Radiomics in determining tumor-to-normal brain SUV ratio based on <sup>11</sup>C-methionine PET/CT in glioblastoma. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine / Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2023; 15(1): 5 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2023.15.1.01.
7. Pronin IN, Khokhlova EV, Konakova TA, et al. Positron emission tomography with <sup>11</sup>C-methionine in primary brain tumor diagnosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020; 120(8): 51–6 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012008151.
8. Vikhrova NB, Postnov AA, Kalaeva DB, et al. <sup>11</sup>C-methionine and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in noninvasive differential diagnosis of anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Radiology and Practice. 2020; 2: 8–19 (in Russ).
9. Comar D, Cartron J, Maziere M, Marazano C. Labelling and metabolism of methionine-methyl-11 C. Eur J Nucl Med. 1976; 1(1): 11–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00253260.
10. Sadetzki S, Bruchim R, Oberman B, et al. Description of selected characteristics of familial glioma patients – results from the Gliogene Consortium. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49(6): 1335–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.009.
11. Yang J, Gohel S, Zhang Z, et al. Glioma-induced disruption of resting-state functional connectivity and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the Salience Network. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021; 42(3): 551–8. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6929.
12. Skvortsova TIu, Brodskaia ZL, Gurchin AF. PET using <sup>11</sup>C-methionine in recognition of pseudoprogression in cerebral glioma after combined treatment. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014; 78(4): 50–8.
13. Jost J, Müther M, Brandt R, et al. Conceptual development of an intensive exercise program for glioma patients (ActiNO): summary of clinical experience. J Neurooncol. 2023; 163(2): 367–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04354-y.
14. Pronin IN, Khokhlova EV, Konakova TA, et al. Positron emission tomography with <sup>11</sup>C-methionine in primary brain tumor diagnosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020; 120(8): 51–6 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012008151.
15. Chipiga L, Sydoff M, Zvonova I, Bernhardsson C. Investigation of partial volume effect in different PET/CT systems: a comparison of results using the MADEIRA phantom and the NEMA NU-2 2001 phantom. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016; 169(1-4): 365–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw027.
16. Takenaka S, Asano Y, Shinoda J, et al. Comparison of <sup>11</sup>C-methionine, <sup>11</sup>C-choline, and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography for distinguishing glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis. Neurol Med Chir. 2013; 54(4): 280–9. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa2013-0117.
17. Deuschl C, Kirchner J, Poeppel TD, et al. <sup>11</sup>C-MET PET/MRI for detection of recurrent glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 45(4): 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3916-9.
18. He Q, Zhang L, Zhang B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of <sup>13</sup>N-ammonia PET, <sup>11</sup>C-methionine PET and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: a comparative study in patients with suspected cerebral glioma. BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1): 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5560-1.
Review
For citations:
Toligi A.Z., Zykov E.M., Semenova A.R., Aksenova S.P., Nudnov N.V., Podolskaya M.V. The Use of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (PET-CT) with 11C-L-Methionine in the Diagnosis of Glial Tumors. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2025;106(5):152-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2025-106-5-152-162
JATS XML







































