Prospects for Using 3D Modeling and Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Endometrioid Ovarian Cysts
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2024-105-1-6-12
Abstract
Background. Ovarian heterotopias are quite successfully diagnosed with ultrasound examinations. Considering the high risk of spread of the disease, as well as reproductive consequences (infertility, pelvic adhesive processes, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, dysmenorrhea), early differential diagnosis of endometrioid cysts and, accordingly, early initiation of treatment are of particular importance.
Objective: to combine ultrasound criteria using 3D visualization and the content of biomarkers to verify stage 1–2 endometrioid ovarian cysts.
Material and methods. In 59 infertile women with endometrioid ovarian cysts, in the dynamics of the menstrual cycle, ultrasound examinations were performed using Acuson S2000 (Siemens, Germany) and Voluson E8 (General Electric, USA) with the possibility of Doppler measurements and three-dimensional reconstruction of tissue images. Also, in laboratories “Invitro”, “Hemotest”, “Nauka” (Samara, Russia) the biomarkers were determined: interleukins IL-1β, IL-6, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and the index by Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). The control group included 195 fertile women of reproductive age. In patients with endometrioid cysts, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed morphologically.
Results. Small unilateral and bilateral ovarian cysts corresponding to stage 1–2 endometriosis by revised American Fertility Society classification (rAFS) were clearly differentiated in 56 (94.9%) patients, in 3 (5.4%) of them the ultrasound result was questionable. In 48 (81.4%) women the lesion was unilateral and in 11 (18.6%) it was bilateral. The structure of cystic formations in all cases was hypoechoic, heterogeneous, in 36 (61.0%) cases it was finely cellular, without blood flow.
Conclusion. Ovarian endometriomas in “gray scale” are round formations of reduced echogenicity and fine suspension, with an even, clear contour, not fused with the surrounding tissues, avascular, changing size depending on menstrual cycle phase. An ovarian mass may have a capsule with locus signals on Doppler. The sensitivity of ultrasound examination in “gray scale” in the presence of an endometrioid cyst is 94.6%.
About the Authors
Е. М. BlazhnovaRussian Federation
Elena M. Blazhnova, Applicant, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
ul. Agibalova, 12, Samara 443041
R. B. Balter
Russian Federation
Regina B. Balter, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chief of Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
Т. V. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Тatiana V. Ivanova, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
Т. А. Pugacheva
Russian Federation
Тatiana А. Pugacheva, Cand. Med. Sc., Ultrasound Diagnostician
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
А. R. Ibragimova
Russian Federation
Аlina R. Ibragimova, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
L. S. Tselkovich
Russian Federation
Lyudmila S. Tselkovich, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
А. Т. Oganisyan
Russian Federation
Аnna Т. Oganisyan, Ultrasound Diagnostician
ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099
References
1. Selkov SA, Yarmolinskaya MI. Endometriosis as a pathology of regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2017; 66(2): 9–13 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD6629-13.
2. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(13): 1244–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764.
3. Bulanov MN, Sorokina YuV, Bulanova MM, Gorta RN. Ultrasound findings in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: literature review and own research data. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2020; 3: 40–64 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2020-3-40-64.
4. Rusina EI, Yarmolinskaya MI, Ivanova AO. Modern methods for radiological diagnosis of endometriosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2020; 69(2): 59–72 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD69259-72.
5. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021; 397(10276): 839–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5.
6. Adamyan LV, Gardanova ZhR, Iarotskaia EL, et al. The characteristics of pain syndrome and the women’s psychoemotional status as well as life quality in women with external genital endometriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2016; 22(3): 77–83 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201622377-83.
7. Bugerenko KA, Larin KV, Shcherbakova LN, et al. Causes of ovarian reserve reduction in endometrioid ovarian cysts. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2018; 17(4): 25–30 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2018-4-25-30.
8. Ozerskaya IA. Echography in gynecology. Мoscow: Vidar-М; 2020: 704 pp (in Russ).
9. Mezhlumova NA, Bobrov MYu, Adamyan LV. Biomarkers of endometriosis: problems and possibilities of early detection of disease recurrence (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018; 24(6): 139–48 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201824061139.
10. Muftaydinova ShK, Buralkina NA, Faizullin LZ. Endometriosis and cancer. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya / Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; 3: 12–7 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.3.12-17.
Review
For citations:
Blazhnova Е.М., Balter R.B., Ivanova Т.V., Pugacheva Т.А., Ibragimova А.R., Tselkovich L.S., Oganisyan А.Т. Prospects for Using 3D Modeling and Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Endometrioid Ovarian Cysts. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2024;105(1):6-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2024-105-1-6-12