Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

Prospects for Using 3D Modeling and Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Endometrioid Ovarian Cysts

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2024-105-1-6-12

Abstract

Background. Ovarian heterotopias are quite successfully diagnosed with ultrasound examinations. Considering the high risk of spread of the disease, as well as reproductive consequences (infertility, pelvic adhesive processes, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, dysmenorrhea), early differential diagnosis of endometrioid cysts and, accordingly, early initiation of treatment are of particular importance.
Objective: to combine ultrasound criteria using 3D visualization and the content of biomarkers to verify stage 1–2 endometrioid ovarian cysts.
Material and methods. In 59 infertile women with endometrioid ovarian cysts, in the dynamics of the menstrual cycle, ultrasound examinations were performed using Acuson S2000 (Siemens, Germany) and Voluson E8 (General Electric, USA) with the possibility of Doppler measurements and three-dimensional reconstruction of tissue images. Also, in laboratories “Invitro”, “Hemotest”, “Nauka” (Samara, Russia) the biomarkers were determined: interleukins IL-1β, IL-6, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and the index by Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). The control group included 195 fertile women of reproductive age. In patients with endometrioid cysts, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed morphologically.
Results. Small unilateral and bilateral ovarian cysts corresponding to stage 1–2 endometriosis by revised American Fertility Society classification (rAFS) were clearly differentiated in 56 (94.9%) patients, in 3 (5.4%) of them the ultrasound result was questionable. In 48 (81.4%) women the lesion was unilateral and in 11 (18.6%) it was bilateral. The structure of cystic formations in all cases was hypoechoic, heterogeneous, in 36 (61.0%) cases it was finely cellular, without blood flow.
Conclusion. Ovarian endometriomas in “gray scale” are round formations of reduced echogenicity and fine suspension, with an even, clear contour, not fused with the surrounding tissues, avascular, changing size depending on menstrual cycle phase. An ovarian mass may have a capsule with locus signals on Doppler. The sensitivity of ultrasound examination in “gray scale” in the presence of an endometrioid cyst is 94.6%.

About the Authors

Е. М. Blazhnova
Samara State Medical University; Russian Railways-Medicine LLC
Russian Federation

Elena M. Blazhnova, Applicant, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099

ul. Agibalova, 12, Samara 443041



R. B. Balter
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Regina B. Balter, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chief of Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



Т. V. Ivanova
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Тatiana V. Ivanova, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



Т. А. Pugacheva
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Тatiana А. Pugacheva, Cand. Med. Sc., Ultrasound Diagnostician

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



А. R. Ibragimova
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Аlina R. Ibragimova, Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



L. S. Tselkovich
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Lyudmila S. Tselkovich, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chair of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Institute of Professional Education

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



А. Т. Oganisyan
Samara State Medical University
Russian Federation

Аnna Т. Oganisyan, Ultrasound Diagnostician

ul. Chapaevskaya, 99, Samara, 443099



References

1. Selkov SA, Yarmolinskaya MI. Endometriosis as a pathology of regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2017; 66(2): 9–13 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD6629-13.

2. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(13): 1244–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764.

3. Bulanov MN, Sorokina YuV, Bulanova MM, Gorta RN. Ultrasound findings in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: literature review and own research data. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2020; 3: 40–64 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2020-3-40-64.

4. Rusina EI, Yarmolinskaya MI, Ivanova AO. Modern methods for radiological diagnosis of endometriosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2020; 69(2): 59–72 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD69259-72.

5. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021; 397(10276): 839–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5.

6. Adamyan LV, Gardanova ZhR, Iarotskaia EL, et al. The characteristics of pain syndrome and the women’s psychoemotional status as well as life quality in women with external genital endometriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2016; 22(3): 77–83 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201622377-83.

7. Bugerenko KA, Larin KV, Shcherbakova LN, et al. Causes of ovarian reserve reduction in endometrioid ovarian cysts. Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2018; 17(4): 25–30 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2018-4-25-30.

8. Ozerskaya IA. Echography in gynecology. Мoscow: Vidar-М; 2020: 704 pp (in Russ).

9. Mezhlumova NA, Bobrov MYu, Adamyan LV. Biomarkers of endometriosis: problems and possibilities of early detection of disease recurrence (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018; 24(6): 139–48 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201824061139.

10. Muftaydinova ShK, Buralkina NA, Faizullin LZ. Endometriosis and cancer. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya / Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; 3: 12–7 (in Russ). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.3.12-17.


Review

For citations:


Blazhnova Е.М., Balter R.B., Ivanova Т.V., Pugacheva Т.А., Ibragimova А.R., Tselkovich L.S., Oganisyan А.Т. Prospects for Using 3D Modeling and Biomarkers in Differential Diagnosis of Endometrioid Ovarian Cysts. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2024;105(1):6-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2024-105-1-6-12

Views: 525


ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)