Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Use of 99mTechnetium-Labeled Recombinant Target Molecules in Different Dosages for the Radionuclide Diagnosis of Her2-Positive Breast Cancer
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2021-102-2-89-97
Abstract
Background. The chief goal in assessing the Her2/neu status in clinical practice is to identify indications for targeted therapy. The main methods for determining the Her2/neu status are an immunohistochemical method and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, despite their widespread use, they have a number of significant disadvantages. Over the past few years, radionuclide diagnosis using a new class of alternative scaffold proteins that meet all the requirements for optimal radionuclide delivery to tumor cells has become widespread.
Objective: comparative analysis of the effectiveness of radionuclide imaging of Her2-positive breast cancer using 99mtechnetium-labeled recombinant molecules in different dosages.
Material and methods. The investigation enrolled 22 patients with breast cancer (T1-4N0-2M0) before systemic therapy: 11 had Her2/neu overexpression; 11 had no marker expression. The patients’ mean age was 50.7 ± 2.3 years. Morphological and immunohistochemical studies were performed in all cases. FISHanalysis was carried out in the presence of the Her2/neu 2+ value. The agent was prepared immediately before using in dosages of 500 and 1000 µg, after which it was slowly administered intravenously to the patient. Whole-body scintigraphy and chest single-photon emission computed tomography were conducted at 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after administration.
Results. The radiochemical yield and radiochemical purity values were 77 ± 9% and 99 ± 1%, respectively. The activity of the agent immediately before administration was 416 ± 135 MBq for the 500 µg group and 349 ± 133 MBq for 1000 µg group. Analysis of the findings indicated that the higher uptake of the agent by organs without tumor lesion was observed in the kidneys, liver, and lungs. The highest renal absorption of the agent was observed in both study groups (0.135 ± 0.042 and 0.191 ± 0.047 mGy, respectively). The effective dose was 0.009 ± 0.002 mGy for the 500 µg group and 0.010 ± 0.003 mGy for the 1000 µg group. The better distribution between the tumors with Her2/neu positive and negative statuses was observed 2 hours after administration in the 500 µg group with the mean tumor/background value of 37 ± 19 for Her2-positive tumors, and 5 ± 2 for Her2-negative tumors (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. The findings suggest that the test radiopharmaceutical agent at a dose of 500 µg can be considered as a new additional method to diagnose Her2-positive breast tumors.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. D. BraginaRussian Federation
Cand. Med. Sc., Senior Researcher, Radionuclide Diagnostics Department, Research Institute of Oncology; Researcher, Research Center “Oncoteranostics”
pereulok Kooperativnyy, 5, Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation
prospekt Lenina, 30, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
V. I. Chernov
Russian Federation
Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of Radionuclide Diagnostics Department, Research Institute of Oncology
pereulok Kooperativnyy, 5, Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation
E. Yu. Garbukov
Russian Federation
Cand. Med. Sc., Senior Researcher, Department of General Oncology, Research Institute of Oncology
pereulok Kooperativnyy, 5, Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation
R. V. Zelchan
Russian Federation
Cand. Med. Sc., Senior Researcher, Radionuclide Diagnostics Department, Research Institute of Oncology
pereulok Kooperativnyy, 5, Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation
prospekt Lenina, 30, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
A. A. Medvedeva
Russian Federation
Cand. Med. Sc., Senior Researcher, Radionuclide Diagnostics Department, Research Institute of Oncology
pereulok Kooperativnyy, 5, Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation
V. M. Tolmachev
Russian Federation
Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Head of Research Center “Oncoteranostics”
prospekt Lenina, 30, Tomsk, 634050, Russian Federation
Segerstedthuset, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 7, Uppsala, Sweden
References
1. Gebhart G, Lamberts LE, Wimana Z, Garcia C, Emonts P, Ameye L, et al. Molecular imaging as a tool to investigate heterogeneity of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and to predict patient outcome under trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): the ZEPHIR trial. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(4): 619–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv577.
2. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Colasacco C, Benson AB 3rd, et al. HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline grom the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016; 140(12): 1345–63. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0331-CP.
3. Tolmachev V. Imaging of HER-2 overexpression in tumors for guiding therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2008; 14(28): 2999–3019. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161208786404290.
4. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(31): 3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984.
5. Chernov VI, Bragina OD, Sinilkin IG, Medvedeva AA, Zelchan RV. Radioimmunotherapy: current state of the problem. Problems in Oncology. 2016; 62(1): 24–30 (in Russ.).
6. Bragina OD, Chernov VI, Zeltchan RV, Sinilkin IG, Medvedeva AA, Larkina MS. Alternative scaffolds in radionuclide diagnosis of malignancies. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2019; 18(3): 125–33 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2019-3-125-133.
7. Zavyalova M, Vtorushin S, Telegina N, Krakhmal N, Savelieva O, Tashireva L, et al. Clinicopathological features of nonspecific invasive breast cancer according to its molecular subtypes. Experimental Oncology. 2016; 38 (2): 122–7.
8. Azhar A, Ahmad E, Zia Q, Rauf MA, Owais M, Ashraf GM. Recent advances in the development of novel protein scaffolds based therapeutics. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; 102: 630–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.045.
9. Nilvebrant J, Hober S. The albumin-binding domain as a scaffold for protein engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2013; 6:e201303009. https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201303009.
10. Nilvebrant J, Åstrand M, Georgieva-Kotseva M, Björnmalm M, Löfblom J, Hober S. Engineering of bispecific affinity proteins with high affinity for ERBB2 and adaptable binding to albumin. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8): e103094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103094.
11. Krasniqi A, D’Huyvetter M, Devoogdt N, Frejd FY, Sorensen J, Orlova A., et al. Same-day imaging using small proteins: clinical experience and translational prospects in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2018; 59(6): 885–91. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.199901.
12. Sandström M, Lindskog K, Velikyan I, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Sandberg D, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the anti-HER2 affibody molecule 68Ga-ABY-025 in breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(6): 867–71. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.169342.
13. Sörensen J, Velikyan I, Sandberg D, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Tolmachev V, et al. Measuring HER2-receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer using [68Ga]ABY-025 Affibody PET/CT. Theranostics. 2016; 6(2): 262–71. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.13502.
14. Keyaerts M, Xavier C, Heemskerk J, Devoogdt N, Everaert H, Ackaert C, et al. Phase I study of 68Ga-HER2-nanobody for PET/CT assessment of HER2 expression in breast carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.162024.
15. Bragina OD, Larkina MS, Stasyuk ES, Chernov VI, Yusubov MS, Skuridin VS, et al. The development of a highly specific radiochemical compound based on labeled 99mTc recombinant molecules for targeted imaging of cells with the overexpression of Her2/neu. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017; 16(3): 25–33 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2017-3-25-33.
16. Tolmachev V, Orlova A, Andersson K. Methods for radiolabelling of monoclonal antibodies. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1060: 309–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-586-6_16.
17. Simeon R, Chen Z. In vitro-engineered non-antibody protein therapeutics. Protein Cell. 2018; 9(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0386-6.
18. Chernov VI, Medvedev AA, Sinilkin IG, Zelchan RV, Bragina OD, Choynzonov EL. Nuclear medicine as a tool for diagnosis and targeted cancer therapy. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2018; 17 (1): 220–31 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2018-1-220-231.
19. Garousi J, Lindbo S, Nilvebrant J, Åstrand M, Buijs J, Sandström M, et al. ADAPT, a novel scaffold protein-based probe for radionuclide imaging of molecular targets that are expressed in disseminated cancers. Cancer Res. 2015; 75(20): 4364–71. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3497.
20. Lindbo S, Garousi J, Åstrand M, Honarvar H, Orlova A, Hober S, Tolmachev V. Influence of histidine-containing tags on the biodistribution of ADAPT scaffold proteins. Bioconjug Chem. 2016; 27(3): 716–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00677.
21. Bragina O, von Witting E, Garousi J, Zelchan R, Sandström M, Medvedeva A, et al. Phase I study of 99mTc-ADAPT6, a scaffold protein-based probe for visualization of HER2 expression in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021; 62(4): 493–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.248799.
22. Bragina OD, Chernov VI, Garbukov EYu, Doroshenko AV, Vorobyeva AG, Orlova AM, Tolmachev VM. Possibilities of radionuclide diagnostics of Her2-positive breast cancer using technetium-99m-labeled target molecules: the first experience of clinical use. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2021; 20(1): 23–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2021-1-23-30.
23. Vorobyeva A, Schulga A, Konovalova E, Güler R, Löfblom J, Sandström M, et al. Optimal composition and position of histidine-containing tags improves biodistribution of 99mTc-labelled DARP in G3. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1); 9405. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45795-8.
Review
For citations:
Bragina O.D., Chernov V.I., Garbukov E.Yu., Zelchan R.V., Medvedeva A.A., Tolmachev V.M. Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Use of 99mTechnetium-Labeled Recombinant Target Molecules in Different Dosages for the Radionuclide Diagnosis of Her2-Positive Breast Cancer. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2021;102(2):89-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2021-102-2-89-97