Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-6-333-343

Abstract

Objective: to compare the data of computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the preoperative estimation of the extension of gastric cancer.

Material and methods. Data on 51 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. CT and DL were performed in all the patients at an interval of 1–2 days during their preoperative examinations to determine the stage of a tumor process. Of the 51 patients, 34 (66.7%) were found to have no distant abdominal metastases and underwent radical surgery. CT and DL revealed distant abdominal organ metastases in 17 (33.3%) of the 51 patients. To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of CT and DL, the investigators calculated the main characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) and auxiliary criteria (accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.

Results. The findings suggested that the diagnostic efficiency of CT in determining the T category was a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 92%; and that of DL was 83% and 87%, respectively. CT in diagnosing a regional lymph node metastasis had a higher sensitivity than DL (88% vs. 63%), but a lower specificity than DL (80% vs. 90%). CT diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis exhibited a sensitivity of 46%, a specificity of 97.4%, an accuracy of 84.3%, PPV of 85.7%, and NPV of 84.1%. The symptoms of peritoneal carcinomatosis were ascites, soft tissue nodules along the peritoneum, diffuse induration and thickening of abdominal tissue planes, and increased mesenteric vascularity.

Conclusion. The combined use of CT and DL is a current algorithm for examining patients with gastric cancer. It makes it possible to obtain complete information about the extension of the process, to increase the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and to form a group of patients to undergo radical surgery.

About the Authors

N. K. Silanteva
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Natalia K. Silanteva, Dr. Med. Sc., Head of the Department of Computed Tomography

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



T. A. Аgababyan
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Tatev A. Аgababyan, Cand. Med. Sc., Senior Researcher, Department of Computed Tomography

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



A. A. Kholeva
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Аnna А. Kholeva, Clinical Resident, Department of Computed Tomography

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



V. Yu. Skoropad
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Vitaliy Yu. Skoropad, Dr. Med. Sc., Head of the Department of Thoracoabdominal Oncology

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



Z. N. Shavladze
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Zurab N. Shavladze, Cand. Med. Sc., Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



S. A. Ivanov
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sergey А. Ivanov, Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Director

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



L. P. Zhavoronkov
Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Leonid P. Zhavoronkov, Dr. Med. Sc., Deputy Head of the Center of Innovation Radiogical and Regenerative Technology

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



References

1. Kaprin AD, Starinskiy VV, Petrova GV (Eds.) Malignancies in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow; 2018 (in Russian).

2. Muntean V, Mihailov A, Iancu C, Toganel R, Fabian O, Domsa I, Muntean MV. Staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer. Accuracy and impact on therapy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009; 18(2): 189–95.

3. Hu YF, Deng ZW, Liu H, Mou TY, Chen T, Lu X, et al. Staging laparoscopy improves treatment decision-making for advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(5): 1859–68. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1859

4. Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Zini C, Cavallo Marincola B, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med. 2009; 114(7): 1065–79. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0455-x

5. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, Kim JS, Kim KW, Kim PN, et al. Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology. 2005; 236(3): 879–85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041101

6. Makino T, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Tsuboyama T, Kim T, Nushijima Y, et al. Preoperative T staging of gastric cancer by multidetector row computed tomography. Surgery. 2011; 149(5): 672–79. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.003

7. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2018.

8. Agababyan T.A. Evaluation of local spread of gastric cancer (T staging) with computed tomography: analysis of mistakes. Medical Visualization. 2012; 3: 33–40 (in Russian).

9. Japanese gastric cancer association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2): 101–12. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5

10. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE–5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(1): 23–34. doi: 10.1016/S14702045-(13)70546-1

11. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002; 40(8): IV–3–18. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020942.47004.03

12. Burbidge S, Mahady K, Naik K. The role of CT and staging laparoscopy in the staging of gastric cancer. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68(3): 251–55. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.07.015

13. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27 (Suppl 5): v38–49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw350

14. Besova NS, Byakhov МYu, Gorbunova VА, Davydov МI, Davydov ММ, Karseladze АI, et al. Clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with stomach cancer. Мoscow: 2014 (in Russian).

15. Blackshaw GR, Barry JD, Edwards P, Allison MC, Thomas GV, Lewis WG. Laparoscopy significantly improves the perceived preoperative stage of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2003; 6(4): 225–29. doi: 10.1007/s10120-003-0257-0

16. Indrakumar A, Mandakulutur GS, Banavara KR. Role of staging laparoscopy in upstaging CT findings and influencing treatment decisions in gastric cancers. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016; 4(12): 5212–16. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20164182

17. Kakroo SM, Rashid A, Wani AA, Akhtar Z, Chalkoo MA, Laharwal AR. Staging laparoscopy in carcinoma of stomach: a comparison with cect staging. Int J Surg Oncol. 2013; 2013: 674965. doi: 10.1155/2013/674965

18. Conlon KC. Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer. Ann Ital Chir. 2001; 72(1): 33–7.

19. Lowy AM, Mansfield PF, Leach SD, Ajani J. Laparoscopic staging for gastric cancer. Surgery. 1996; 119(6): 611–14. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80184-x

20. D’Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D, Grani M. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10(12): 1877–85. doi: 10.1007/s003300000537

21. Tsujimoto H, Yaguchi Y, Sakamoto N, Kumano I, Takahata R, Matsumoto Y, et al. Computed tomography lymphography for the detection of sentinel nodes in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2010; 101(12): 2586–90. doi: 10.1111/j.13497006.2010.01706.x

22. Guo JC, Chang CC, Yang CY, Liao BC, Liau JY, Chang CH, et al. Computed tomographic characteristics for patients with unresectable gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. Med Oncol. 2017; 34(8): 143. doi: 10.1007/s12032017-1004-4

23. Wang Z, Chen JQ. Imaging in assessing hepatic and peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011; 9: 11–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-19

24. Yajima K, Kanda T, Ohashi M, Wakai T, Nakagawa S, Sasamoto R, et al. Clinical and diagnostic significance of preoperative computed tomography findings of ascites in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2006; 192(2): 185–90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.007


Review

For citations:


Silanteva N.K., Аgababyan T.A., Kholeva A.A., Skoropad V.Yu., Shavladze Z.N., Ivanov S.A., Zhavoronkov L.P. Comparative Analysis of Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy Data in Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2020;101(6):333-343. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-6-333-343

Views: 1161


ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)