CURRENT COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TRACHEOMALACIA IN PATIENTS WITH CICATRICIAL TRACHEAL STENOSIS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-4-197-203
Abstract
Objective: to analyze current radiodiagnostic techniques in identifying tracheomalacia (TM) and estimating its severity and extent in patients with cicatricial tracheal stenosis (CTS) and to determine the important characteristics of TM according to follow-up multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.
Material and methods. The investigation included the results of examining 94 patients, 81 of whom were diagnosed with CTS. To analyze the efficiency of the studies, the patients were divided into three groups; a control group of patients was formed. The diagnosis of TM was verified by clinical examination, instrumental diagnosis, MSCT and MRI studies, and intraoperative revision. The patients’ postoperative features were taken into consideration. Diagnostic performance measures, such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, were calculated. Static radiation techniques (MSCT and MRI) and follow-up procedures (fMSCT and fMRI) were compared.
Results. The follow-up procedures were proven to be twice as informative for the detection of the symptoms of TM as the endoscopic method that is considered the main method for the diagnosis of pathological tracheal changes. The diagnostic capabilities of MSCT, fMSCT, MRI, and fMRI were determined; criteria for identifying TM were formulated. The use of the follow-up procedures to identify clinically significant TM in patients with CTS could radically alter surgical tactic in 36.9% of cases.
Conclusion. The proposed algorithm for examination of patients with CTS, which includes follow-up radiation procedures to evaluate the functional state of the tracheal wall, makes it possible to determine an optimal treatment policy and to significantly reduce the risks of complications and disease recurrences.
About the Authors
I. M. KorolevaRussian Federation
Dr. Med. Sc., Professor.
ul. Bol’shaya Pirogovskaya, 2, stroenie 4, Moscow, 119991.
M. A. Mishchenko
Russian Federation
Cand. Med. Sc., Radiologist.
ul. Bol’shaya Pirogovskaya, 2, stroenie 4, Moscow, 119991.
References
1. Зенгер В.Г., Наседкин А.Н., Паршин В.Д. Хирургия повреждений гортани и трахеи. М.: Медкнига; 2007: 334–48. [Zenger V.G., Nasedkin A.N., Parshin V.D. Surgery of lesions of larynx and trachea. Moscow: Medkniga; 2007: 334–48 (in Russ.).]
2. Перельман Ю.М. Хирургия трахеи. М.: Медицина; 1972. [Perel’man Yu.M. Surgery of the trachea. Moscow: Meditsina; 1972 (inRuss.).]
3. Фоломеев В.Н., Сотников В.Н., Молчанов И.В., Парфенова А.В., Толмачева Т.В. Сравнительный анализ диагностических методов исследования патологии гортани и трахеи. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2006; 12 (6): 20–5. [Folomeev V.N., Sotnikov V.N., MolchanovI.V., Parfenova A.V., Tolmacheva T.V. The comparable analysis of methods of diagnostic of the pathology of larynx and trachea. Endoscopic Surgery. 2006; 12 (6): 20–5 (in Russ.).]
4. Паршин В.Д., Королева И.М., Мищенко М.А. Эволюция методов диагностики рубцового стеноза трахеи и трахеомаляции. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2016; 5: 17–25. DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2016517-25 [Parshin V.D., Koroleva I.M., Mishchenko M.A. Evolution of diagnostic methods for cicatricial stenosis and tracheomalacia. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016; 5: 17–25 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/ hirurgia201651725]
5. Паршин В.Д., Королева И.М., Мищенко М.А., Паршин В.В. Диагностика и лечение приобретенной трахеомаляции у пациентов с рубцовым стенозом трахеи. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2016; 8: 73–82. DOI: 10.17116/ hirurgia2016873-82 [Parshin V.D., Koroleva I.M., Mishchenko M.A., Parshin V.V. Diagnosis and treatment of acquired tracheomalacia inpatients with cicatricial tracheal stenosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016; 8: 73–82 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia 2016873-82]
6. Фоломеев В.Н., Сотников В.Н. Факторы, способствующие стенозированию трахеи. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2001; 7 (5): 42–5. [Folomeev V.N., Sotnikov V.N. Factors contributing to stenosis of the trachea. Endoscopic Surgery. 2001; 7 (5): 42–5 (in Russ.).]
7. De Baets F., De Schutter I., Aarts C., Haerynck F., Van Daele S., De Wachter E. et. al. Malacia, inflammation and bronchoalveolar lavage culture in children with persistent respiratorysymptoms. Eur. Resp. J. 2012; 39(2): 392–5. DOI: 10.1183/ 09031936.00035111
8. Baroni R., Ashiku S., Boiselle P.M. Dynamic CT evaluation of the central airways in patients undergoing tracheoplasty for tracheobronchomalacia. AJR. 2005; 184 (5): 1444–9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841444
9. Carden K.A., Boiselle P.M., Waltz D.A. Tracheomalacia and tracheo-bronchomalacia in children and adults. CHEST. 2005; 127 (3): 984–1005. DOI: 10.1378/chest. 127.3.984
10. Boiselle P.M., O'Donnell C., Bankier A., Ernst A., Miller M.E., Potemkin A. Tracheal collapsibility in healthy volunteers during forced expiration: assessment with multidetector CT. Radiology. 2009; 252 (1): 255–62. DOI: 10.1148/radiol. 2521081958
Review
For citations:
Koroleva I.M., Mishchenko M.A. CURRENT COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF TRACHEOMALACIA IN PATIENTS WITH CICATRICIAL TRACHEAL STENOSIS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2018;99(4):197-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-4-197-203