BIFID MANDIBULAR CONDYLE
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-5-263-268
Abstract
This article describes the clinical cases of doubling of the mandibular condylar process, which is detected by means of multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The patients had no clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders. This pathology of the temporomandibular joint is a rare form of embryopathy and develops as a consequence of a violation of the mandibular condylar cartilage morphogenesis. Its radiographic signs are similar to the deformation of the mandibular condyle, which is a result of the progression of inflammation and remodeling of joint surfaces. Methods of CBCT and MSCT possess sufficient resolution for the differential diagnosis of congenital and acquired pathology of the temporomandibular joint.
About the Authors
Yu. M. Mel’nichenko
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus
MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Chair of Human Morphology; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
Belarus
MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Chair of Human Morphology; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
N. А. Savrasova
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus
MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Radiation Examination and Radiation Therapy Chair; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
Belarus
MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Radiation Examination and Radiation Therapy Chair; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
S. L. Kabak
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Chief Researcher; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
Belarus
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Chief Researcher; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
N. V. Zhuravleva
Belarusian State Medical University
Belarus
Senior Lecturer of Department of Human Morphology; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
Belarus
Senior Lecturer of Department of Human Morphology; prospekt Dzerzhinskogo, 83, Minsk, 220116
References
1. Hrdlicka A. Lower jaw: double condyles. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1941; 28: 75–89.
2. Schier M.B. The temporomandibular joint: a consideration of its probable functional and dysfunctional sequelae and report condyle double head in a young person. Dent. Items Interest. 1948; 70: 779–87.
3. Tanner J.M., Friedlander A.H., Chang T.I. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles diagnosed with threedimensional reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2012; 41 (8): 691–5. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15030240
4. Gupta R., Gupta P., Gupta S., Gupta T. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyles: a case report. Int. J. Maxillofac. Res. 2015; 1(2): 149–53.
5. Villaс5a-Carvalho M.F., Manhaes L.R. Jr., de Moraes M.E., Lopes S.L. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016; 20 (3): 289–94. DOI: 10.1007/ s10006-016-0569-y
6. Ibragimova R.S., Zhartybaev R., Iskakova M.K., Kurmangalieva G.A., Lobanov Yu.S., Beklemisheva N.I. Abnormal development of temporomandibular joint. A case report. Int. Sci. J. 2014; 2 (6): 135–9.
7. Menezes A.V., de Moraes Ramos F.M., de Vasconcelos-Filho J.O., Kurita L.M., de Almeida S.M., HaiterNeto F. The prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected in a Brazilian population. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2008; 37: 220–3.
8. Miloglu O., Yalcin E., Buyukkurt M., Yilmaz A., Harorli A. The frequency of bifid mandibular condyle in a Turkish patient population. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2010; 39: 42–6.
9. Cho B.H., Jung Y.H. Nontraumatic bifid mandibular condyles in asymptomatic and symptomatic temporomandibular joint subjects. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2013; 43: 25–30.
10. Gunduz R., Buyuk C., Egrioglu E. Evaluation of the prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle detected on cone beam computed tomography images in a Turkish population. Int. J. Morphol. 2015; 33 (1): 43–7.
11. Haghnegahdar A.A., Bronoosh P., Khojastepour L., Tahmassebi P. Prevalence of bifid mandibular condyle in a selected population in South of Iran. J. Dent. (Shiraz). 2014; 15 (4): 156–60.
12. Woo M.H., Yoon K.H., Park K.S., Park J.A. Post-traumatic bifid mandibular condyle: a case report and literature review. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2016; 46 (3): 217–22. DOI: 10.5624/ isd.2016.46.3.217
13. Dennison J., Mahoney P., Herbison P., Dias G. The false and the true bifid condyles. Homo. 2008; 59: 149–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb. 2008.02.001
14. Lopez-Lopez J., Ayuso-Montero R., Jane-Salas E., Rosello-Llabres X. Bifid condyle: review of the literature of the last 10 years and report of two cases. Cranio. 2010; 28: 136–40.
15. Antoniades K., Hadjipetrou L., Antoniades V., Paraskevopoulos K. Bilateral bifid mandibular condyle. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2004; 97: 535–8.
16. Ghom A.G., Ghom S.A. Textbook of oral medicine. 3d edn. London: JP Medical Ltd; 2014.
17. Ongole R., Praveen B.N. Textbook of oral medicine, oral diagnosis and oral radiology. 2nd edn. Elsevier; 2013.
18. Gundlach K.K., Fuhrmann A., Beckmann-Van der Ven G. The doubleheaded mandibular condyle. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1987; 64: 249–53.
19. Blackwood H.J. The double-headed mandibular condyle. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1957; 15: 1–8.
20. Rusu M.C., Pop F., Leonardi R., Motoc A.G., Jianu A.M. Morphologic features of the fetal mandibular condyle: layers, canals and microvascular pattern. Ann. Anat. 2011; 193 (5): 436–46. DOI: 10.1016/ j.aanat.2011.03.006
Review
For citations:
Mel’nichenko Yu.M., Savrasova N.А., Kabak S.L., Zhuravleva N.V. BIFID MANDIBULAR CONDYLE. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2017;98(5):263-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-5-263-268
Views:
1344
Email this article 