Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

RADIOLOGY OF UROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER TREATMENT OF PELVIC TUMORS. PART I. URINARY FISTULAS

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-2-111-118

Abstract

Urinary fistulas complicating treatment of pelvic tumors are the clinical diagnostic problem that needs research and decision. The top-priority radiological method for diagnostic urinary fistulas is computed tomography. About application magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is less well knows. The possibilities MRI to diagnostic of urinary fistulas are illustrated in the article; we discuss the limitation of method requiring additional use of other radiological methods. A literature search on the topic of research was carried out on the databases PubMed and eLIBRARY.

About the Authors

T. P. Berezovskaya
А.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the RF
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Leader Research Associate,

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



N. K. Silant’eva
А.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the RF
Russian Federation

MD, PhD, DSc, Head of Computed Tomography Department,

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



O. G. Beketova
А.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of the RF
Russian Federation

Research Associate,

ul. Koroleva, 4, Obninsk, 249036



References

1. Kaprin A.D., Garmash S.V., Rerberg A.G. Complications of the upper urinary tract with radiation and chemoradiation therapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiologiya–Praktika (Radiology–Practice, Russian journal). 2009; 1: 41–8 (in Russ.).

2. Loran O.B., Seregin A.V., Dovlatov Z.A. Modern approaches to the treatment of post-radiation urogenital fistula in women. Eksperimental'naya i Klinicheskaya Urologiya (Experimental and Clinical Urology, Russian journal). 2015; 4: 42–5 (in Russ.).

3. Likic I.S., Kadija S., Ladjevic N.G., Stefanovic A., Jeremic K., Petkovic S. et al. Analysis of urologic complications after radical hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 199 (6): 644.

4. Likić-Ladević I., Kadija S., Ladević N., Stefanović A., Argirović R., Petković S. et al. Urological complications after radical hysterectomy: incidence rates and predisposing factors. Vojnosanit. Pregl. 2007; 64 (6): 381–4.

5. Frasson M., Garcia-Granero E., Parajó A., Garcia-Mayor L., Flor B., Garcia-Granero A. et al. Rectal cancer threatening or affecting the prostatic plane: is partial prostatectomy oncologic adequate? Result of multicenter retrospective study. Colorectal. Dis. 2015; 16 (8): 689–97.

6. Kats E., Venema P.L. Kropman R.F. A rare complication after endoscopic resection of the prostate: osteitis pubis due to prostate-symphisis fistula. J. Urol. 1997; 157: 624.

7. Kats E., Venema P.L., Kropman R.F., Kieft G.J. Diagnosis and treatment of osteitis pubis caused by prostate-symphysis fistula: a rare complication after transurethral resection of the prostate. Br. J. Urol. 1998; 81 (6): 927–8.

8. Yu N.C., Raman S.S., Patel M., Barbaric Z. Fistulas of the genitourinary tract: a radiologic review. Radiographics. 2004; 24 (5): 1331–52.

9. Narayanan P., Nobbenhuis M., Reynolds K.M., Sahdev A., Reznek R.H., Rockall A.G. Fistulas in malignant gynecologic disease: etiology, imaging, and management. Radiographics. 2009; 29 (4): 1073–83.

10. Paspulati R.M., Dalal T.A Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery. Radiographics. 2010; 30 (3): 625–42.

11. Tang Y.Z., Booth T.C., Swallow D., Shahabuddin K., Thomas M., Hanbury D. et al. Imaging features of colovesical fistulae on MRI. Br. J. Radiol. 2012; 85 (1018): 1371–5.

12. Golabek T., Szymanska A., Szopinski T., Bukowczan J., Furmanek M., Powroznik J. et al. Enterovesical fistulae: aetiology, imaging, and management. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2013; 2013: 617967.

13. Ravichandran S., Ahmed H.U., Matanhelia S.S., Dobson M. Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas? Urology. 2008; 72 (4): 832–7.

14. Semelka R.C., Hricak H., Kim B., Forstner R., Bis K.G., Ascher S.M. et al. Pelvic fistulas: appearances on MR images. Abdom. Imaging. 1997; 22 (1): 91–5.


Review

For citations:


Berezovskaya T.P., Silant’eva N.K., Beketova O.G. RADIOLOGY OF UROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER TREATMENT OF PELVIC TUMORS. PART I. URINARY FISTULAS. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2017;98(2):111-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2017-98-2-111-118

Views: 27268


ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)