TRANSRADIAL APPROACH DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS. PART 1. EVIDENCE BASE FOR APPLYING A TRANSRADIAL APPROACH
https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-1-56-62
Abstract
The use of the radial artery as an approach to percutaneous coronary interventions is becoming increasing popular now. The success of this approach depends on both the accumulated experience of an operator and a health care facility. The paper analyzes an investigation of the comparative characteristics of both a transradial approach and a transfemoral one and the impact of the former on the success of the procedure. It considers the role of the transradial approach in the present-day practice of X-ray endovascular diagnosis and treatment specialists and discusses the problems of education and choice of optimal clinical indications.
About the Authors
Sh. T. ZhamgyrchievRussian Federation
MD, PhD, Cardiologist
A. N. Samko
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Endovascular Diagnosis and Treatment
E. V. Merkulov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Researcher of the Department of Endovascular Diagnosis and Treatment
V. M. Mironov
Russian Federation
Cardiologist
I. V. Levitskiy
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Department of Endovascular Diagnosis and Treatment
A. S. Tereshchenko
Russian Federation
Cardiologist
R. O. Shirokov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Cardiologist
A. M. Gerasimov
Russian Federation
MD, PhD, Cardiologist
References
1. Radner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radial artery; preliminary report of a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1948; 29: 178–80.
2. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1989; 16: 3–7.
3. Jolly S.S., Yusuf S., Cairns J. et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1409–20.
4. Romagnoli E., Biondi-Zoccai G., Sci-ahbasi A. et al. The RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomi-zed Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2481–9.
5. Vink M.A., Amoroso G., Dirksen M.T. et al. Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: procedural aspects and outcomes in 2209 patients treated in a single high-volume centre. Heart. 2011; 97: 1938–42.
6. Pristipino C., Roncella A., Trani C. et al. Prospective Registry of Vascular Access in Interventions in Lazio region (PREVAIL) study group. Identifying factors that predict the choice and success rate of radial artery catheterisation in contemporary real world cardiology practice: a subanalysis of the PRVAIL study data. EuroIntervention. 2010; 6: 240–6.
7. Joyal D., Bertrand O.F., Rinfret S. et al. Meta-Analysis of Ten Trials on the Effectiveness of the Radial versus the Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2012; 109: 813–8.
8. Hamm C.W., Bassand J.P., Agewall S. et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2011; 32: 2999–3054.
9. Steg P.G., Huber K., Andreotti F. et al. Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart J. 2011; 32: 1854–64.
10. Wijns W., Kolh P., Danchin N. et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 2010; 31: 2501–55.
11. Verheugt F.W., Steinhubl S.R., Hamon M. et al. Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011; 4: 191–7.
12. Hamon M., Lipiecki J., Carrié D. et al. Silent cerebral infarcts after cardiac catheterization: a random-ized comparison of radial and femoral approaches. Am. Heart J. 2012; 164: 449–54.
13. Pelliccia F., Trani C., Biondi-Zoccai G.G. et al. Prospective Registry of Vascular Access in Interventions in Lazio Region (prevail) Study Group. Comparison of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Transradial Coronary Angiography Via Right Versus Left Radial Artery Approaches (from the PREVAIL Study). Am. J. Cardiol. 2012; 110: 771–5.
14. Hamon M., Mehta S., Steg P.G. et al. Impact of transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions on bleeding and net adverse clinical events in acute coronary syndromes. EuroIntervention. 2011; 7: 91–7.
15. Pristipino C., Pelliccia F., Granatelli A. et al. Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral artery. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007; 99: 1216–21.
Review
For citations:
Zhamgyrchiev Sh.T., Samko A.N., Merkulov E.V., Mironov V.M., Levitskiy I.V., Tereshchenko A.S., Shirokov R.O., Gerasimov A.M. TRANSRADIAL APPROACH DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS. PART 1. EVIDENCE BASE FOR APPLYING A TRANSRADIAL APPROACH. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2014;(1):56-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-1-56-62