USE OF PHASE-CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO QUANTIFY CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH COMMUNICATING HYDROCEPHALUS

Objective: to determine differences in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow velocities in patients with varying degrees of communicating hydrocephalus (CH) versus a group of healthy volunteers without hydrodynamic disorders. Material and methods. The investigation enrolled 27 CH patients (17 and 10 patients with an Evans index of 0.31 and 0.46, respectively) and 62 healthy volunteers. Average, volumetric, and peak flow velocities were determined at different intracranial levels. Results. Analysis of differences between the mean values indicated that the patients with CH were observed to have progressive cranial cavity CSF outflow obstruction that depended on the degree of dilation of the ventricular system and, probably, on impaired CSF reabsorption. These changes can provide an explanation for the clinical symptoms present in the patients and also serve as diagnostic criteria. Conclusion. The investigation showed that phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging might be used to estimate the quantitative indicators of CSF in health and in varying degrees of CH. The velocity characteristics of antegrade and retrograde CSF flows are significantly different in health and in disease, which may be relevant to neurologists and neurosurgeons when planning therapy and surgery options.

1. Hakim S. Some observations on CSF pressure: Hydrocephalic syndrome in adults with «Normal» CSF pressure-recognition of a new syndrome: Javeriana University School of Medicine. 1964; Bogotá, Columbia.

2. Bradleya W.G., Safara F.G., Hurtadoa C., Orda J., Alksneb J.F. Increased intracranial volume: A clue to the etiology of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 1479–84.

3. Johnston I., Teo Ch. Disorders of CSF hydrodynamics. Childs Nervous System. 2000; 16: 776–99.

4. McQuarrie I.G., Saint-Louis L., Scherer P.B. Treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus with low versus medium pressure cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Neurosurgery. 1984; 15: 484–8.

5. Jeffreys R.V., Wood M.M. Adult non-tumourous dementia and hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 1978; 45: 103–14.

6. Pashkova A.A. Magnetic resonance imaging in the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and the state of the brain in patients with hydrocephalus. MD, PhD sci. Thesises of Diss. St. Petersburg; 2014 (in Russian).

7. Matsumae M., Kikinis R., Morocz I., Lorenzo A.V. Intracranial compartment volumes in patients with enlarged ventricles assessed by magnetic resonance-based image processing. J. Neurosurg. 1996; 84 (6): 972–81.

8. Lakin G.F. Biometrics. 4th edn. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1990 (in Russian).

9. Huang T.Y., Chung H.W., Chen M.Y., Giiang L.H., Chin S.C., Lee C.S. et al. Supratentorial cerebrospinal fluid production rate in healthy adults: quantification with twodimensional cine phase-contrast MR Imaging with high temporal and spatial resolution. Radiology. 2004; 233: 603–8.

10. Nitz W.R., Bradley W.J., Watanabe A.S., Lee R.R., Burgoyne B., O’Sullivan R.M. et al. Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology. 1992; 183: 395–405.