Preview

Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Advanced search

Differential Diagnosis of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis with Its Non-Fibrotic Phenotype and Usual Interstitial Pneumonia During High-Resolution Computed Tomography

https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2023-104-3-168-181

Abstract

Background. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is not an easy task. The most difficult aspects of the disease include differential diagnosis of its fibrotic (fHP) and non-fibrotic (nfHP) phenotypes, as well as their differentiation from usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The determination of fibrous changes at an early stage of development can significantly accelerate the beginning of antifibrotic therapy and improve the prognosis.

Objective: to identify key HRCT signs for reliable differentiation of fHP and nfHP, to carry out differential diagnostics between fHP and UIP.

Material and methods. The data of 73 patients with morphologically verified HP, in whom HRCT had been performed, were retrospectively analysed. In 21 patients, nfHP was determined, and in 52 patients fHP was identified. The comparison group consisted of 24 patients with a typical radiological UIP pattern. The analysis of the changes detected during HRCT was carried out by qualitative and semi-quantitative methods. The significance of qualitative differences in a sign manifestation was assessed by Fisher’s exact test, semi-quantitative differences were evaluated using Mann–Whitney test.

Results. The results of the study allow to assume, that the presence and degree of manifestation of certain HRCT signs significantly differ between the selected groups of patients in qualitative and/or semi-quantitative terms. In cases of НP, the distribution of changes was mostly uniform and diffuse, with no clear predominance in certain lobes. In UIP, diffuse craniocaudal distribution took place, and in the axial plane, the changes were mainly subpleural in nature.

Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, it can be assumed that fHP significantly differs from nfHP in such features as the presence and degree of manifestation of ground glass and honeycombing symptoms, reticular changes and traction bronchiectases. When comparing the fHP and UIP groups, the distinctive signs of fHP were centrilobular nodules, mosaic pattern, as well as diffuse axial sign distribution.

About the Authors

I. E. Tuyrin
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation

Igor Е. Tuyrin - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chief of Chair of Radiology

ul. Barrikadnaya, 2/1, str. 1, Moscow, 125993



D. A. Kuleshov
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation

Dmitry А. Kuleshov - Applicant, Chair of Radiology

ul. Barrikadnaya, 2/1, str. 1, Moscow, 125993



M. V. Samsonova
Federal Pulmonology Research Institute; Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center
Russian Federation

Мaria V. Samsonova - Dr. Med. Sc., Head of Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy; Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Innovative Pathomorphology

Orekhovyy bulvar, 28, Moscow, 115682

Shosse Entuziastov, 86, Moscow, 111123



A. L. Chernyaev
Federal Pulmonology Research Institute; Petrovsky Russian Scientific Centre of Surgery; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Аndrey L. Chernyaev - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of Department of Fundamental Pulmonology; Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Clinical Morphology, Avtsyn Scientific Research Institute of Human Morphology; Professor, Chair of Pathological Anatomy and Clinical Pathological Anatomy

Orekhovyy bulvar, 28, Moscow, 115682

ul. Tsuryupy, 3, Moscow, 117418

ul. Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997



E. V. Kusraeva
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital Gospitalnaya pl., 3, Moscow, 105094
Russian Federation

Elina V. Kusraeva - Pathologist, Pathoanatomic Department

Gospitalnaya pl., 3, Moscow, 105094



N. V. Trushenko
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Trushenko - Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Pulmonology

ul. Trubetskaya, 8, str. 2, Moscow, 119048



S. Yu. Chikina
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Svetlana Yu. Chikina - Cand. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chair of Pulmonology

ul. Trubetskaya, 8, str. 2, Moscow, 119048



S. N. Avdeev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Sergey N. Avdeev - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Academician of RAS, Chief of Chair of Pulmonology, Director, National Medical Research Center on the “pulmonology” profile

Trubetskaya, 8, str. 2, Moscow, 119048



References

1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 202(3): e36–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202005-2032st.

2. Lacasse Y, Selman M, Costabel U, et al. Clinical diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 168(8): 952–8. http://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200301-137OC.

3. Lacasse Y, Selman M, Costabel U, et al. Classification of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009; 149(2): 161–6. http://doi.org/10.1159/000189200.

4. Fernández Pérez ER, Travis WD, Lynch DA, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest. 2021; 160(2): e97–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.066.

5. Walsh SLF, Sverzellati N, Devaraj A, et al. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: high resolution computed tomography patterns and pulmonary function indices as prognostic determinants. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(8): 1672–9. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2427-0.

6. Churg A, Sin DD, Everett D, et al. Pathologic patterns and survival in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33(12): 1765–70. http://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e3181bb2538.

7. Avdeev SN. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Pulmonologiya. 2021; 31(1): 88–99 (in Russ.). http://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2021-31-1-88-99.

8. Avdeev SN, Chikina SYu, Tyurin IE, et al. Chronic fibrosing progressing interstitial lung disease: a decision of Multidisciplinary Expert Board. Pulmonologiya. 2021; 31(4): 505–10 (in Russ.). http://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2021-31-4-505-510.

9. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008; 246(3): 697–722. http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2462070712.

10. Tateishi T, Johkoh T, Sakai F, et al. High-resolution CT features distinguishing usual interstitial pneumonia pattern in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Jpn J Radiol. 2020; 38(6): 524–32. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00932-6.

11. Shobeirian F, Mehrian P, Doroudinia A. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis high-resolution computed tomography findings, and their correlation with the etiology and the disease duration. Prague Med Rep. 2020; 121(3): 133–41. http://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2020.12.

12. Silva CIS, Müller NL, Lynch DA, et al. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: differentiation from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia by using thin-section CT. Radiology. 2008; 246(1): 288–97. http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453061881.

13. Barnett J, Molyneaux PL, Rawal B, et al. Variable utility of mosaic attenuation to distinguish fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2019; 54(1): 1900531. http://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00531-2019.

14. Vasakova M, Morell F, Walsh S, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: perspectives in diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 196(6): 680–9. http://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201611-2201pp.

15. Johannson KA, Elicker BM, Vittinghoff E, et al. A diagnostic model for chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Thorax. 2016; 71(10): 951–4. http://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208286.

16. Salisbury ML, Gross BH, Chughtai A, et al. Development and validation of a radiologic diagnosis model for hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir J. 2018; 52(2): 1800443. http://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00443-2018.

17. Chung JH, Zhan X, Cao M, et al. Presence of air trapping and mosaic attenuation on chest computed tomography predicts survival in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14(10): 1533–8. http://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.201701-035OC.

18. Franquet T, Hansell DM, Senbanjo T, et al. Lung cysts in subacute hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003; 27(4): 475–8. http://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200307000-00003.

19. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198(5): e44–68. http://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST.


Review

For citations:


Tuyrin I.E., Kuleshov D.A., Samsonova M.V., Chernyaev A.L., Kusraeva E.V., Trushenko N.V., Chikina S.Yu., Avdeev S.N. Differential Diagnosis of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis with Its Non-Fibrotic Phenotype and Usual Interstitial Pneumonia During High-Resolution Computed Tomography. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2023;104(3):168-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2023-104-3-168-181

Views: 520


ISSN 0042-4676 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0478 (Online)