Experience with Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in the Assessment of the Microvascular Bed by Contrast-Free Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Chronic Cerebral Ischemia

Objective: to define the role of transcranial electrical stimulation in the assessment of the microvascular bed by contrast-free magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in patients with chronic cerebral ischemia.
Material and methods. Examinations were made in 37 people aged 65-70 years who were diagnosed with chronic cerebral ischemia. The patients were divided into two groups: with and without cognitive impairment (CI). The investigation algorithm involved brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Toshiba Vantage Titan, 1.5 T), transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) using a TETOS computer hardware diagnostics (Research and Production Firm “BIOSS”) and repeated brain MRI in the arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion mode. ASL perfusion data were used to assess cerebral blood flow in the regions of interest before and after TES.
Results. Contrast-free MR perfusion imaging revealed relative hyperperfusion within the cortex of the frontal and parietal lobes concurrent with hypoperfusion of the subcortical nuclei and cerebral white matter in patients with CI, which suggests that enhanced cortical blood flow is ineffective and shunting blood flow forms. TES caused a statistically significant change in cerebral perfusion in the non-CI group of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia. After TES by ASL perfusion imaging, the patients without CI showed a diffuse increase in cerebral blood flow (p = 0.002), whereas the group of apparently healthy volunteers exhibited this increase in blood flow.
Conclusion. Cerebral perfusion indices before and after TES in patients of all the examined groups define its role as a complementary tool to assess the compensatory capabilities of the microvascular bed by contrast-free MR perfusion imaging in chronic cerebral ischemia.

1. Raimkulov BN. Cerebrovascular disorders (literature review). Vestnik KazNMU. 2014; 2(1): 185–8 (in Russ.).

2. Shavlovskaya OA. Being of sound mind and body. Non Nocere. New Therapeutic Journal. 2018; 11: 39–43 (in Russ.).

3. Gudkova VV, Stakhovskaya LV. Chronic insufficiency of cerebral circulation. Spravochnik poloclinicheskogo vracha / Guide for polyclinic doctor. 2004; 5: 47–51 (in Russ.).

4. Yakhno NN, Levin OS, Damulin IV. Comparison of clinical and MRI data in dyscirculatory encephalopathy. Report 2: Cognitive impairment. The Neurological Journal. 2001; 6(3): 10–9 (in Russ.).

5. Zhivolupov S.A., Samartsev I.N. Modern clinical analysis of cerebrovascular diseases: key issues of differential diagnosis and pathogenetic treatment. Farmateka. 2012; 7: 93–100 (in Russ.).

6. Sergeeva AN, Dobryinina LA, Gadgieva ZSh, et al. Cerebral blood flow measured with mri arterial spin labeling (asl) and neuroimaging signs of age-related small vessel disease. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2019; 9(4): 8–17 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-4-8-17.

7. Østergaard L, Thorbjørn SE, Moreton F, et al. Cerebral small vessel disease: capillary pathways to stroke and cognitive decline. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016; 36(2): 302–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x15606723.

8. Zakharov VV, Gromova DO. Diagnostics and treatment of chronic cerebrovascular insufficiency. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya / Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2015; 13: 48–54 (in Russ.).

9. Shmonin A.A., Krasnov V.S., Shmonina I.A., Melnikova E.V. Current therapy for chronic cerebrovascular attack. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2015; 7(1): 99–106 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2015-1-99-106.

10. Kremneva EI, Suslin AS, Dobrynina LA, Krotenkova MV. MRI in the diagnosis of age-related small vessel disease: instruction for radiologist. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2020; 10(4): 186–206 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2020-10-4-186-206.

11. Chukhontseva ES, Morozova TG, Borsukov AV. Neuroimaging patterns of chronic cerebrovascular insufficiency with evaluation of cerebral perfusion depending on the level of cognitive disorders. Medical Visualization. 2020; 24(3): 114–22 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2020-3-114-122.

12. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12(8): 822–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70124-8.

13. Rothwell J. Transcranial brain stimulation: past and future. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018; 2: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2398212818818070.

14. Zvonikov VM, Grishchenko AV, Gerasin IK. Application of TETOS transcranial computerized electrical stimulator with feedback to optimize neuropsychological characteristics (methodological recommendations). Мoscow: 2006 (in Russ.).

15. TETOS transcranial computerized electrical stimulator with feedback to optimize neuropsychological characteristics: user manual. Мoscow; 2006 (in Russ.).

16. Dissanayaka T, Zoghi M, Farrell M, et al. Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 2017; 46(4): 1968–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13640.

17. Solomons CD, Shanmugasundaram V. A review of transcranial electrical stimulation methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurol India. 2019; 67(2): 417–23. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.258057.

18. Guryeva PV, Bykov YuN, Vasiliev YuN (comp.) Dyscirculatory encephalopathy: a textbook for doctors. Irkutsk: IGMU; 2017 (in Russ.).

19. Damulin IV. Dyscirculatory encephalopathy: pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic aspects. Difficult Patient. 2005; 3(6): 11–7 (in Russ.).

20. Dai W, Lopez OL, Carmichael OT, et al. Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: patterns of altered cerebral blood flow at MR imaging. Radiology. 2009; 250(3): 856–66. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503080751.