Improving the Algorithm for the Management of Patients with Viral Hepatitis Using Contrast-Free Hepatic Arterial Spin Labelling Magnetic Resonance Perfusion

Objective: improving the algorithm for the management of patients with viral hepatitis using contrast-free arterial spin labelling (ASL) magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion.

Material and methods. A total of 116 patients with viral hepatitis (VH) B, C and B + C were examined on the basis of Clinical hospital No. 1 (Smolensk): 75 (64.7%) men and 41 (35.3%) women, mean age 49.7 ± 2.3 years. The patients underwent instrumental diagnostic methods: ultrasound, clinical elastography, contrast-free hepatic ASL MR perfusion. Liver biopsy (n = 57) was used as the reference method.

Results. The results of ASL MR perfusion had a high correlation with the data of clinical elastography in the diagnosis of fibrotic process; the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ASL liver perfusion in the diagnosis of fibrotic process was: AUROC 0.943 (95% CI, 0.884–0.953). There was a high correlation between ASL MR perfusion with Doppler ultrasound of hepatic blood vessels in the diagnosis of arterial blood flow disorders, but in VH В + C and cirrhosis – diagnostic and prognostic significance of the method: AUROC 0.951 (95% CI 0.932–0.972).

Conclusion. ASL MR perfusion in VH patients allows to predict fibrotic changes in the hepatic parenchyma (AUROC 0.934 (95% CI 0.845–0.957)), provides information about changes in blood flow in the parenchymal structure (p < 0.005). The algorithm for the examination of VH patients should include contrast-free ASL MR perfusion at admission (AUROC 0.865 (95% CI 0.843–0.928)) and in dynamic follow-up (AUROC 0.915 (95% CI 0.881–0.946)).

1. Bilalova AR, Makashova VV. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis of different etiology. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2015; 2(22): 8–14 (in Russ.).

2. Moon MA, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epidemiology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(12): 2650–2666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.060.

3. Schiff ER, Sorrell МF, Maddrey WС (Eds) Schiff’s diseases of the liver. 10th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins/Wolters Kluwer business; 2007.

4. Trufanov GE, Fokin VA, Asaturyan EG, et al. Arterial spin labeling: physiсal fundamentals and general questions. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2019; 9(3): 190–200 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-3-190-200.

5. Ratnikov VA, Skulskiy SK. Role of MRI in complex imaging distal part of common bile duct obstruction. Medical Visualization. 2016; 4: 64–75 (in Russ.).

6. Kalchev E, Georgiev R, Balev B. Arterial spin labeling MRI – clinical applications. Varna Medical Forum. 2019; 6(2): 28–32.

7. Dietrich CF, Tuma J, Badea R. Ultrasound of the liver. EFSUMB – Europen Course Book. Student Edition; 2013: 1–64.

8. Trofimova TN, Belikova MYa, Yakovleva DM, Druzina MM. CT perfusion and MR-elastography of the pancreas in predicting the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2020; 11(4): 80–6 (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-4-80-86.

9. Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen. Abdom Imaging. 2015: 40(4): 745–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0315-6.