<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rentrad</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-4676</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0478</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Limited Liability Company "LUCHEVAYA DIAGNOSTIKA", Russian Association of Radiologists</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-5-304-312</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rentrad-594</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Фармакоэкономическая оценка применения одномолярного гадолинийсодержащего магнитно-резонансного контрастного препарата по сравнению с полумолярными препаратами для диагностики рассеянного склероза</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Using One-Molar Gadolinium-Based Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Compared to Half-Molar Agents for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-7919</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алиханов</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Alikhanov</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Алиханов Алихан Амруллахович - доктор медицинских наук, профессор, заведующий отделением лучевой диагностики, РДКБ ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова МР.</p><p>Ленинский пр-т, 117, Москва, 119571</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alikhan A. Alikhanov - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Head of Radiology Department.</p><p>Leninskiy Prospekt, 117, Moscow, 119571</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8887-4420</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шимэновский</surname><given-names>Н. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shimanovskiy</surname><given-names>N. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Шимановский Николай Львович - доктор медицинских наук, профессор, чл.-корр. РАН, заведующий кафедрой молекулярной фармакологии и радиобиологии им. академика П.В. Сергеева.</p><p>Ул. Островитянова, 1, Москва, 117997</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nikolay L. Shimanovskiy - Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS, Chief of Chair of Molecular Pharmacology and Radiobiology.</p><p>Ul. Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">shimannn@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Обособленное структурное подразделение Российская детская клиническая больница, ФГАОУ ВО Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>101</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>304</fpage><lpage>312</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Алиханов А.А., Шимэновский Н.Л., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Алиханов А.А., Шимэновский Н.Л.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Alikhanov A.A., Shimanovskiy N.L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/594">https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/594</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель: провести сравнительную оценку фармакоэкономических преимуществ применения гадобутрола по сравнению с полумолярными препаратами для диагностики рассеянного склероза (PC).</p></sec><sec><title>Материал и методы</title><p>Материал и методы. Разработан калькулятор в MS Excel, в рамках которого было получено количество обострений рассеянного склероза при применении одномолярного гадолинийсодержащего магнитно-резонансного контрастного средства (MPKC) и полумолярных препаратов, а также проанализированы фармакоэкономические результаты посредством проведения анализа затрат и анализа влияния на бюджет. В анализе были учтены только прямые медицинские затраты (затраты на исследования (введение MPKC) и на госпитализацию по причине возникновения обострения), финансируемые в рамках системы обязательного медицинского страхования. Расчет результатов приведен на когорту из 1000 пациентов.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Анализ фармакоэкономической эффективности показал, что магнитно-резонансные исследования центральной нервной системы с применением гадобутрола характеризуются сокращением числа обострений PC на 70 случаев. В анализе затрат применение гадобутрола у пациентов с массой тела как менее 75 кг (вводимый объем 7.5 мл), так и более 75 кг (вводимый объем 15 мл) продемонстрировало снижение итоговых затрат по сравнению с полумолярными препаратами (гадодиамидом, гадотеровой кислотой и гадотеридолом). Анализ влияния на бюджет показал, что перевод 1000 пациентов с исследований с помощью полумолярных MPKC на гадобутрол за счет сокращения числа случаев обострений PC приводит к экономии бюджетных средств в группе пациентов до 75 кг в размере от 4 264 610 до 6 565 827 руб., а в группе пациентов более 75 кг - от 2 267 767 до 6 870 201 руб.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. В результате фармакоэкономического моделирования установлено, что применение гадобутрола в исследованиях центральной нервной системы для диагностики PC в сравнении с использованием полумолярных MPKC может позволить сократить количество обострений PC и привести к экономии денежных средств.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Objective: to conduct a comparative assessment of the pharmacoeconomic advantages of using gadobutrol in comparison with half-molar (0.5 M) gadolinium chelates for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS).</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Material and methods. A calculator was developed in Microsoft Excel, in which the number of exacerbations of multiple sclerosis was obtained when using one-molar (1.0 M) gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and 0.5 M gadolinium chelates, and pharmacoeconomical results were analyzed by conducting a cost analysis and a budget impact analysis. The analysis took into account only direct medical costs (research costs (administering of GBCAs) and hospitalization costs due to exacerbations) funded under the mandatory health insurance system. The results have been calculated for a cohort of 1.000 patients.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The analysis of pharmacoeconomic effectiveness showed that magnetic resonance studies of the central nervous system using gadobutrol were characterized by a reduction in the number of MS exacerbations by 70 cases. In the cost analysis the use of gadobutrol in both patients less than 75 kg (7.5 ml administered volume) and more than 75 kg (15 ml administered volume) demonstrated a reduction in total costs compared to 0.5 M gadolinium chelates (gadodiamide, gadoteric acid, and gadoteridol). Budget impact analysis showed that the transfer of 1.000 patients with studies using 0.5 M GBCAs on the gadobutrol due to the reduction in the incidence of MS exacerbations leads to budgetary savings in the group of patients under 75 kg from 4.264.610 to 6.565.827 RUB, and in patients more than 75 kg from 2.267.767 to 6.870.201 RUB.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. As a result of pharmacoeconomical modeling, it was found that the use of gadobutrol for central nervous system studies for the diagnosis of MS in comparison with using 0.5 GBCAs can reduce the number of MS exacerbations and lead to money savings.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рассеянный склероз</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансные контрастные средства</kwd><kwd>гадолинийсодержащие контрастные средства</kwd><kwd>одномолярный препарат</kwd><kwd>полумолярный препарат</kwd><kwd>гадобутрол</kwd><kwd>гадотеридол</kwd><kwd>гадодиамид</kwd><kwd>гадотеровая кислота</kwd><kwd>анализ затрат</kwd><kwd>анализ влияния на бюджет</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>multiple sclerosis</kwd><kwd>magnetic resonance contrast agents</kwd><kwd>gadolinium-based contrast agents</kwd><kwd>one-molar drug</kwd><kwd>half-molar drug</kwd><kwd>gadobutrol</kwd><kwd>gadoteridol</kwd><kwd>gadodiamide</kwd><kwd>gadoteric acid</kwd><kwd>cost analysis</kwd><kwd>budget impact analysis</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Данный фармакоэкономический анализ выполнен при поддержке АО «Байер»</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This pharmacoeconomic analysis was supported by JSC “Bayer”</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gasperini С, Prosperini L, Tintore M, Sormani MP, Filippi M, Rio J, et al. Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: a clinical and MRI challenge. Neurology. 2019; 92(4): 180-92. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006810</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gasperini С, Prosperini L, Tintore M, Sormani MP, Filippi M, Rio J, et al. Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: a clinical and MRI challenge. Neurology. 2019; 92(4): 180-92. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006810</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Revised Guidelines of the Consortium of MS Centers MRI Protocol for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of MS, 2018. Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/mscare.site-ym.com/resource/collection/9C5F19B9-3489-48B0-A54B-623A1ECEE07B2018MRIGuidelines_booklet_withfinal_changes_0522.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Revised Guidelines of the Consortium of MS Centers MRI Protocol for the Diagnosis and Follow-up of MS, 2018. Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/mscare.site-ym.com/resource/collection/9C5F19B9-3489-48B0-A54B-623A1ECEE07B2018MRIGuidelines_booklet_withfinal_changes_0522.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(2): 162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422 (17) 30470-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(2): 162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422 (17) 30470-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rovira XA, Auger XC, Huerga XE, Corral XJF, Mitjana XR, Sastre-Garriga J, et al. Cumulative dose of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent improves detection of enhancing lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 38(8): 1486-93. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5253</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rovira XA, Auger XC, Huerga XE, Corral XJF, Mitjana XR, Sastre-Garriga J, et al. Cumulative dose of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent improves detection of enhancing lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 38(8): 1486-93. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5253</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uysal E., Erturk SM, Yildirim H, Seleker F, Basak M. Sensitivity of immediate and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI after injection of 0.5 M and 1.0 M Gadolinium chelates for detecting multiple sclerosis lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(3): 697-702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2212</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uysal E., Erturk SM, Yildirim H, Seleker F, Basak M. Sensitivity of immediate and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI after injection of 0.5 M and 1.0 M Gadolinium chelates for detecting multiple sclerosis lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(3): 697-702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2212</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015; 275(3): 772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15150025</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015; 275(3): 772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15150025</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lohrke J, Frisk AL, Frenzel T, Schockel L, Rosenbruch M, Jost G, et al. Histology and gadolinium distribution in the rodent brain after the administration of cumulative high doses of linear and macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents. Invest Radiol. 2017; 52(6): 324-33. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000344</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lohrke J, Frisk AL, Frenzel T, Schockel L, Rosenbruch M, Jost G, et al. Histology and gadolinium distribution in the rodent brain after the administration of cumulative high doses of linear and macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents. Invest Radiol. 2017; 52(6): 324-33. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000344</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramalho J, Semelka RC, Ramalho M, Nunes RH, AlObaidy M, Castillo M. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: an update. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(7): 1192-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4615</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ramalho J, Semelka RC, Ramalho M, Nunes RH, AlObaidy M, Castillo M. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: an update. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(7): 1192-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4615</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Runge VM. Safety of the gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging, focusing in part on their accumulation in the brain and especially the dentate nucleus. Invest Radiol. 2016; 51(5): 273-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000273</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Runge VM. Safety of the gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging, focusing in part on their accumulation in the brain and especially the dentate nucleus. Invest Radiol. 2016; 51(5): 273-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000273</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olchowy C, Cebulski K, Lasecki M, Chaber R, Olchowy A, Kaf-wak K, Zaleska-Dorobisz U. The presence of the gadolinium-based contrast agent depositions in the brain and symptoms of gadolinium neurotoxicity: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0171704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171704</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olchowy C, Cebulski K, Lasecki M, Chaber R, Olchowy A, Kaf-wak K, Zaleska-Dorobisz U. The presence of the gadolinium-based contrast agent depositions in the brain and symptoms of gadolinium neurotoxicity: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0171704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171704</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robert P, Lehericy S, Grand S, Violas X, Fretellier N, Idee JM, et al. T1-weighted hypersignal in the deep cerebellar nuclei after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents in healthy rats: difference between linear and macrocyclic agents. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 473-80. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000181</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robert P, Lehericy S, Grand S, Violas X, Fretellier N, Idee JM, et al. T1-weighted hypersignal in the deep cerebellar nuclei after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents in healthy rats: difference between linear and macrocyclic agents. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 473-80. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000181</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ACR Manual on contrast media 2020. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/7media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/Contrast_Media.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ACR Manual on contrast media 2020. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/7media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/Contrast_Media.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ESUR Guidelines on contrast agents. European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Available at: http://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/2019/ESUR_Guidelines_10.0_Final_Version.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ESUR Guidelines on contrast agents. European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Available at: http://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/2019/ESUR_Guidelines_10.0_Final_Version.pdf (accessed July 17, 2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кармазановский Г.Г., Шимановский Н.Л., Барышев П.М. Фармакоэкономическая оценка применения одномолярного гадолинийсодержащего магнитно-резонансного контрастного средства по сравнению с полумолярными препаратами для диагностики заболеваний ЦНС. Медицинская визуализация. 2012; 4: 1-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karmazanovskiy GG, Shimanovskiy NL, Baryshev PM. Pharmaco-economic study of one molar gadolinium magnetic-resonance contrast media use for diagnostics of CNS diseases in comparison with 0.5 molar ones. Medical Visualization. 2012; 4: 1-5 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
