<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rentrad</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-4676</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0478</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Limited Liability Company "LUCHEVAYA DIAGNOSTIKA", Russian Association of Radiologists</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-4-221-234</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">rentrad-573</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЗОРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REVIEWS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Роль методов радионуклидной диагностики в нейроонкологии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Role of Radionuclide Diagnostic Methods in Neuro-Oncology</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0392-7576</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Скворцова</surname><given-names>Т. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Skvortsova</surname><given-names>T. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Med. Sc., Leading Researcher of Neurovisualization Laboratory, Radiologis</p><p>ul. Akademika Pavlova, 9, Saint-Petersburg, 197376, Russian Federation</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">tanya@ihb.spb.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-9306</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Judov</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Judov</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>бакалаврWilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p>Templergraben 55, 52062 Aachen, Germany</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bachelor of Science </p><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p>Templergraben 55, 52062 Aachen, Germany</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-4591</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Plotkin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Plotkin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Med. Sc., Professor</p><p>Landsberger Allee 49, 10249 Berlin, Germany</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7114-1941</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Stoffels</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Stoffels</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д. м. н., Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-1796</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Galldiks</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Galldiks</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д. м. н., доктор философии, профессорWilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p>Kerpener 62, 50937 Köln, Germany</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p> </p><p>Kerpener 62, 50937 Köln, Germany</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-5"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-7949</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Красикова</surname><given-names>Р. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Krasikova</surname><given-names>R. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Chem. Sc., Head of Radiochemistry Laboratory </p><p>ul. Akademika Pavlova, 9, Saint-Petersburg, 197376, Russian Federation</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-6"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-5075</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Langen</surname><given-names>K. J.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Langen</surname><given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д. м. н., доктор философии, профессор</p><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p>Templergraben 55, 52062 Aachen, Germany</p><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Med. Sc., Professor</p><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, D-52425 Jülich, Germany</p><p>Templergraben 55, 52062 Aachen, Germany</p><p>Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-7"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУН «Институт мозга человека им. Н.П. Бехтеревой» Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences,</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт нейронаук и ядерной медицины, научный центр Юлиха;&#13;
Университет Ахена, отдел ядерной медицины</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich Research Centre;&#13;
Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University of Aachen</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт ядерной медицины Вивантеса</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Vivantes Institute of Nuclear Medicine</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-4"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт нейронаук и ядерной медицины, научный центр Юлиха</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich Research Centre</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-5"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт нейронаук и ядерной медицины, научный центр Юлиха;&#13;
Кельнский университет, отдел неврологии,</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich Research Centre;&#13;
Department of Neurology, University of Cologne</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-6"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУН «Институт мозга человека им. Н.П. Бехтеревой» Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-7"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт нейронаук и ядерной медицины, научный центр Юлиха;&#13;
Университет Ахена, отдел ядерной медицины;&#13;
Исследовательское объединение Юлих–Ахен (ИОЮА), секция «Мозг»</institution><country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich Research Centre;&#13;
Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University of Aachen;&#13;
Jülich–Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Section Brain</institution><country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>221</fpage><lpage>234</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Скворцова Т.Ю., Judov N., Plotkin M., Stoffels G., Galldiks N., Красикова Р.Н., Langen K.J., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Скворцова Т.Ю., Judov N., Plotkin M., Stoffels G., Galldiks N., Красикова Р.Н., Langen K.J.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Skvortsova T.Y., Judov N., Plotkin M., Stoffels G., Galldiks N., Krasikova R.N., Langen K.J.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/573">https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/573</self-uri><abstract/><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"/><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>обзор</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd><kwd>однофотонная эмиссионная компьютерная томография</kwd><kwd>опухоли головного мозга</kwd><kwd>радиофармпрепараты класса аминокислот</kwd><kwd>O-(2’-18F-фторэтил)-L-тирозин</kwd><kwd>68Ga-DOTATOC</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>review</kwd><kwd>positron emission tomography</kwd><kwd>single-photon emission computed tomography</kwd><kwd>brain&#13;
tumors</kwd><kwd>amino acid radiopharmaceuticals</kwd><kwd>O-(2-[18F] fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)</kwd><kwd>[68Ga]DOTATOC</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16 (Suppl 4): PMC4193675. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16 (Suppl 4): PMC4193675. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Pep. 2012; 14: 48–54. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Pep. 2012; 14: 48–54. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weller M, van den Bent M, Hopkins K, Tonn JC, Stupp R, Falini A, et al. EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(9): 395–403. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70011-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weller M, van den Bent M, Hopkins K, Tonn JC, Stupp R, Falini A, et al. EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(9): 395–403. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70011-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brandsma D, van den Bent MJ. Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009; 22(6): 6338. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332363e</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brandsma D, van den Bent MJ. Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009; 22(6): 6338. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332363e</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rapp M, Heinzel A, Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Feisberg J, Sabel M, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed cerebral lesions suggestive of glioma. J Nucl Med. 2013; 54(2): 229–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.109603</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rapp M, Heinzel A, Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Feisberg J, Sabel M, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed cerebral lesions suggestive of glioma. J Nucl Med. 2013; 54(2): 229–35. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.109603</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss C, Rapp M, Blau T, Tscherpel C, et al. The use of dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(9): 1293– 300. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov088</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss C, Rapp M, Blau T, Tscherpel C, et al. The use of dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(9): 1293– 300. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov088</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen W. Clinical applications of PET in brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(9): 1468–81. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037689</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen W. Clinical applications of PET in brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(9): 1468–81. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037689</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Padma MV, Said S, Jacobs M, Hwang DR, Dunigan K, Satter M, et al. Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG-PET in gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2003; 64(3): 227–37. doi: 10.1023/A: 1025665820001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Padma MV, Said S, Jacobs M, Hwang DR, Dunigan K, Satter M, et al. Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG-PET in gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2003; 64(3): 227–37. doi: 10.1023/A: 1025665820001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yoon JH, Kim JH, Kang WJ, Sohn CH, Choi SH, Yun TJ, et al. Grading of cerebral glioma with multiparametric MR imaging and 18F-FDG-PET: concordance and accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(2): 380–9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3019-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yoon JH, Kim JH, Kang WJ, Sohn CH, Choi SH, Yun TJ, et al. Grading of cerebral glioma with multiparametric MR imaging and 18F-FDG-PET: concordance and accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(2): 380–9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3019-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prieto E, Marti-Climent JM, Dominguez-Prado I, Garrastachu P, Díez-Valle R, Tejada S, et al. Voxel-based analysis of dual-timepoint 18F-FDG PET images for brain tumor identification and delineation. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(6): 865–72. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085324</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prieto E, Marti-Climent JM, Dominguez-Prado I, Garrastachu P, Díez-Valle R, Tejada S, et al. Voxel-based analysis of dual-timepoint 18F-FDG PET images for brain tumor identification and delineation. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(6): 865–72. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085324</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeWitte O, Levivier M, Violon P, Salmon I. Prognostic value positron emission tomography with [18F]-fluoro-2- deoxy-D-glucose in the low-grade glioma. J Neurosurg. 1996; 39(3): 470–6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeWitte O, Levivier M, Violon P, Salmon I. Prognostic value positron emission tomography with [18F]-fluoro-2- deoxy-D-glucose in the low-grade glioma. J Neurosurg. 1996; 39(3): 470–6. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glantz MJ, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE, Friedman AH, Hanson MW, Burger PC, et al. Identification of early recurrence of primary central nervous system tumors by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991; 29(4): 347–55. doi: 10.1002/ana.410290403</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glantz MJ, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE, Friedman AH, Hanson MW, Burger PC, et al. Identification of early recurrence of primary central nervous system tumors by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991; 29(4): 347–55. doi: 10.1002/ana.410290403</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Basu S, Alavi A. Molecular imaging (PET) of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009; 19(4): 625–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.012</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Basu S, Alavi A. Molecular imaging (PET) of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009; 19(4): 625–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.012</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ricci PE, Karis JP, Heiserman JE, Fram EK, Bice AN, Drayer BP. Differentiating recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis: time for re-evaluation of positron emission tomography? Am J Neurorad. 1998; 19(3): 407–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ricci PE, Karis JP, Heiserman JE, Fram EK, Bice AN, Drayer BP. Differentiating recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis: time for re-evaluation of positron emission tomography? Am J Neurorad. 1998; 19(3): 407–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Langen KJ. Applications of PET imaging of neurological tumors with radiolabeled amino acids. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 59(1): 70–82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Langen KJ. Applications of PET imaging of neurological tumors with radiolabeled amino acids. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 59(1): 70–82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fedorova O, Kuznetsova O, Stepanova M, Maleev V, Belokon Yu, Wester HJ, еt al. A facile direct nucleophilic synthesis of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine([18F]FET) without HPLC purification. J Rad Nucl Chem. 2014; 301: 505–12. doi: 10.1007/s10967-014-3121-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fedorova O, Kuznetsova O, Stepanova M, Maleev V, Belokon Yu, Wester HJ, еt al. A facile direct nucleophilic synthesis of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine([18F]FET) without HPLC purification. J Rad Nucl Chem. 2014; 301: 505–12. doi: 10.1007/s10967-014-3121-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langen KJ, Hamacher K, Weckesser M, Floeth F, Stoffels G, Bauer D, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl Med Biol. 2006; 33(3): 287–94. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langen KJ, Hamacher K, Weckesser M, Floeth F, Stoffels G, Bauer D, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl Med Biol. 2006; 33(3): 287–94. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kratochwil C, Combs SE, Leotta K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Rieken S, Debus J, et al. Intra-individual comparison of (1)(8)F-FET and (1)(8)F-DOPA in PET imaging of recurrent brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16(3): 434–40. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not199</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kratochwil C, Combs SE, Leotta K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Rieken S, Debus J, et al. Intra-individual comparison of (1)(8)F-FET and (1)(8)F-DOPA in PET imaging of recurrent brain tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16(3): 434–40. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not199</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moulin-Romsee G, D’Hondt E, de Groot T, Goffin J, Sciot R, Mortelmans L, et al. Non-invasive grading of brain tumours using dynamic amino acid PET imaging: does it work for 11C-methionine? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12): 2082–7. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0557-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moulin-Romsee G, D’Hondt E, de Groot T, Goffin J, Sciot R, Mortelmans L, et al. Non-invasive grading of brain tumours using dynamic amino acid PET imaging: does it work for 11C-methionine? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12): 2082–7. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0557-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cicone F, Filss CP, Minniti G, Rossi-Espagnet C, Papa A, Scaringi K, et al. Volumetric assessment of recurrent or progressive gliomas: comparison between F-DOPA PET and perfusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(6): 905–15. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3018-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cicone F, Filss CP, Minniti G, Rossi-Espagnet C, Papa A, Scaringi K, et al. Volumetric assessment of recurrent or progressive gliomas: comparison between F-DOPA PET and perfusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(6): 905–15. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3018-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Pope WB. From the clinician’s point of view – What is the status quo of positron emission tomography in patients with brain tumors? Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(11): 1434–44. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov118</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Pope WB. From the clinician’s point of view – What is the status quo of positron emission tomography in patients with brain tumors? Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(11): 1434–44. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov118</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamacher K, Coenen HH. Efficient routine production of the 18F-labelled amino acid O-2-18F fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine. Appl Radiat Isot. 2002; 57(6): 853–6. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00225-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamacher K, Coenen HH. Efficient routine production of the 18F-labelled amino acid O-2-18F fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine. Appl Radiat Isot. 2002; 57(6): 853–6. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00225-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krasikova R, Orlovskaya V, Stepanova M, Fedorova O. The effect of reaction media and phase transfer catalyst on the fluorination yield and enantiomeric purity in asymmetric synthesis of O-(2’-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Curr Org Chem. 2013; 17(19): 2159–63. doi: 10.2174/13852728113179990108</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasikova R, Orlovskaya V, Stepanova M, Fedorova O. The effect of reaction media and phase transfer catalyst on the fluorination yield and enantiomeric purity in asymmetric synthesis of O-(2’-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Curr Org Chem. 2013; 17(19): 2159–63. doi: 10.2174/13852728113179990108</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hutterer M, Hau P, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Pitfalls of [F18]-FET PET in the diagnostics of brain tumors. Der Nuklearmediziner. 2015; 38(4): 295–303. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564177</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hutterer M, Hau P, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Pitfalls of [F18]-FET PET in the diagnostics of brain tumors. Der Nuklearmediziner. 2015; 38(4): 295–303. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564177</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herholz K, Hölzer T, Bauer B, Schröder R, Voges J, Ernestus RI, et al. 11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of lowgrade gliomas. Neurology. 1998; 50(5): 1316–22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1316</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herholz K, Hölzer T, Bauer B, Schröder R, Voges J, Ernestus RI, et al. 11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of lowgrade gliomas. Neurology. 1998; 50(5): 1316–22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1316</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, et al. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2016; 18(9): 1199–208. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now058</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, et al. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2016; 18(9): 1199–208. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now058</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langen KJ, Watts C. Neuro-oncology: amino acid PET for brain tumours – ready for the clinic? Nature Reviews Neurology. 2016; 12(7): 375–6. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.80</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langen KJ, Watts C. Neuro-oncology: amino acid PET for brain tumours – ready for the clinic? Nature Reviews Neurology. 2016; 12(7): 375–6. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.80</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schulz S, Pauli SU, Schulz S, Händel M, Dietzmann K, Firsching R, Höllt V. Immunohistochemical determination of five somatostatin receptors in meningioma reveals frequent over expression of somatostatin receptor subtype sst2A. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(5): 1865–74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schulz S, Pauli SU, Schulz S, Händel M, Dietzmann K, Firsching R, Höllt V. Immunohistochemical determination of five somatostatin receptors in meningioma reveals frequent over expression of somatostatin receptor subtype sst2A. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(5): 1865–74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dutour A, Kumar U, Panetta R, Ouafik L, Fina F, Sasi R, Patel YC. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human brain tumors. Int J Cancer. 1998; 76(5): 620–7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980529)76: 5&lt;620: : AID-IJC2&gt;3.0.CO; 2-S</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dutour A, Kumar U, Panetta R, Ouafik L, Fina F, Sasi R, Patel YC. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human brain tumors. Int J Cancer. 1998; 76(5): 620–7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980529)76: 5&lt;620: : AID-IJC2&gt;3.0.CO; 2-S</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Hipp P, Kowalski J, Becker DW, Doll J, et al. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(7): 1053–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Henze M, Schuhmacher J, Hipp P, Kowalski J, Becker DW, Doll J, et al. PET imaging of somatostatin receptors using [68GA]-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide: first results in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42(7): 1053–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Soto-Montenegro ML, Peña-Zalbidea S, Mateos-Pérez JM, Oteo M, Romero E, Morcillo MÁ, Desco M. Meningiomas: a comparative study of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE for molecular imaging in mice. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e111624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111624</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soto-Montenegro ML, Peña-Zalbidea S, Mateos-Pérez JM, Oteo M, Romero E, Morcillo MÁ, Desco M. Meningiomas: a comparative study of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE for molecular imaging in mice. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e111624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111624</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Afshar-Oromieh A, Giesel FL, Linhart HG, Haberkorn U, Haufe S, Combs SE, et al. Detection of cranial meningiomas: comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(9): 1409–15. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2155-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Afshar-Oromieh A, Giesel FL, Linhart HG, Haberkorn U, Haufe S, Combs SE, et al. Detection of cranial meningiomas: comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(9): 1409–15. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2155-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rachinger W, Stoecklein VM, Terpolilli NA, Haug AR, Ertl L, Pöschl J, et al. Increased 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake in PET imaging discriminates meningioma and tumor-free tissue. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(3): 347–53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.149120</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rachinger W, Stoecklein VM, Terpolilli NA, Haug AR, Ertl L, Pöschl J, et al. Increased 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake in PET imaging discriminates meningioma and tumor-free tissue. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(3): 347–53. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.149120</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milker-Zabel S, Zabel-du Bois A, Henze M, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Hoess A, et al. Improved target volume definition for fractionated stereotacticradiotherapy in patients with intracranial meningiomas by correlation of CT, MRI, and [68Ga]- DOTATOC-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(1): 222–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milker-Zabel S, Zabel-du Bois A, Henze M, Huber P, Schulz-Ertner D, Hoess A, et al. Improved target volume definition for fractionated stereotacticradiotherapy in patients with intracranial meningiomas by correlation of CT, MRI, and [68Ga]- DOTATOC-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(1): 222–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nyuyki F, Plotkin M, Graf R, Michel R, Steffen I, Denecke T, et al. Potential impact of(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT on stereotactic radiotherapy planning of meningiomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(2): 310–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1270-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nyuyki F, Plotkin M, Graf R, Michel R, Steffen I, Denecke T, et al. Potential impact of(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT on stereotactic radiotherapy planning of meningiomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(2): 310–8. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1270-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graf R, Nyuyki F, Steffen IG, Michel R, Fahdt D, Wust P, et al. Contribution of(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT to target volume delineation of skull base meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(1): 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.021</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graf R, Nyuyki F, Steffen IG, Michel R, Fahdt D, Wust P, et al. Contribution of(68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT to target volume delineation of skull base meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(1): 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.021</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graf R, Plotkin M, Steffen IG, Wurm R, Wust P, Brenner W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and 68GaDOTATOC positron emission tomography for imaging skull base meningiomas with infracranial extension treated with stereotactic radiotherapy – a case series. Head Face Med. 2012; 8: 1. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graf R, Plotkin M, Steffen IG, Wurm R, Wust P, Brenner W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and 68GaDOTATOC positron emission tomography for imaging skull base meningiomas with infracranial extension treated with stereotactic radiotherapy – a case series. Head Face Med. 2012; 8: 1. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gehler B, Paulsen F, Oksüz MO, Hauser TK, Eschmann SM, Bares R, et al. [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT for meningioma IMRT treatment planning. Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4: 56. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-56</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gehler B, Paulsen F, Oksüz MO, Hauser TK, Eschmann SM, Bares R, et al. [68Ga]-DOTATOC-PET/CT for meningioma IMRT treatment planning. Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4: 56. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-4-56</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Combs SE, Welzel T, Habermehl D, Rieken S, Dittmar JO, Kessel K, et al. Prospective evaluation of early treatment outcome in patients with meningiomas treated with particle therapy based on target volume definition with MRI and 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Acta Oncol. 2013; 52(3): 514–20. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.762996</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Combs SE, Welzel T, Habermehl D, Rieken S, Dittmar JO, Kessel K, et al. Prospective evaluation of early treatment outcome in patients with meningiomas treated with particle therapy based on target volume definition with MRI and 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET. Acta Oncol. 2013; 52(3): 514–20. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.762996</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schillaci O, Filippi L, Manni C, Santoni R. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in brain tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2007; 37(1): 34–47. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.08.003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schillaci O, Filippi L, Manni C, Santoni R. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in brain tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2007; 37(1): 34–47. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.08.003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hellwig D, Ketter R, Romeike BF, Schaefer A, Farmakis G, Grgic A, et al. Prospective study of p-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine and SPECT for the evaluation of newly diagnosed cerebral lesions: specific confirmation of glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(12): 2344–53. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1572-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hellwig D, Ketter R, Romeike BF, Schaefer A, Farmakis G, Grgic A, et al. Prospective study of p-[123I]iodo-L-phenylalanine and SPECT for the evaluation of newly diagnosed cerebral lesions: specific confirmation of glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(12): 2344–53. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1572-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langen KJ, Pauleit D, Coenen HH. 3-[(123)I]Iodo-alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl Med Biol. 2002; 29(6): 625–31. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(02)00328-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langen KJ, Pauleit D, Coenen HH. 3-[(123)I]Iodo-alpha-methyl-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl Med Biol. 2002; 29(6): 625–31. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(02)00328-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmidt M, Scheidhauer K, Luyken C, Voth E, Hildebrandt G, Klug N, et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in intracranial tumors. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 25(7): 675–86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmidt M, Scheidhauer K, Luyken C, Voth E, Hildebrandt G, Klug N, et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in intracranial tumors. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 25(7): 675–86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bohuslavizki KH, Brenner W, Braunsdorf WE, Behnke A, Tinnemeyer S, Hugo HH, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the differential diagnosis of meningioma. Nucl Med Commun. 1996; 17(4): 302–10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bohuslavizki KH, Brenner W, Braunsdorf WE, Behnke A, Tinnemeyer S, Hugo HH, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the differential diagnosis of meningioma. Nucl Med Commun. 1996; 17(4): 302–10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collet S, Valable S, Constans JM, Lechapt-Zalcman E, Roussel S, Delcroix N, et al. [(18)F]-fluoro-L-thymidine PET and advanced MRI for preoperative grading of gliomas. NeuroImage Clin. 2015; 8: 448–54. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.012</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collet S, Valable S, Constans JM, Lechapt-Zalcman E, Roussel S, Delcroix N, et al. [(18)F]-fluoro-L-thymidine PET and advanced MRI for preoperative grading of gliomas. NeuroImage Clin. 2015; 8: 448–54. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.012</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Sasakawa Y, Ichikawa T, et al. 11C-methionine(MET) and 18F-fluorothymidine(FLT) PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(11): 2009–17. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0847-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Sasakawa Y, Ichikawa T, et al. 11C-methionine(MET) and 18F-fluorothymidine(FLT) PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(11): 2009–17. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0847-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nowosielski M, DiFranco MD, Putzer D, Seiz M, Recheis W, Jacobs AH, et al. An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(4): e95830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095830</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nowosielski M, DiFranco MD, Putzer D, Seiz M, Recheis W, Jacobs AH, et al. An intra-individual comparison of MRI, [18F]-FET and [18F]-FLT PET in patients with high-grade gliomas. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(4): e95830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095830</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giovannini E, Lazzeri P, Milano A, Gaeta MC, Ciarmiello A. Clinical applications of choline PET/CT in brain tumors. Curr Pharm Des. 2015; 21(1): 121–7. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140915120742</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giovannini E, Lazzeri P, Milano A, Gaeta MC, Ciarmiello A. Clinical applications of choline PET/CT in brain tumors. Curr Pharm Des. 2015; 21(1): 121–7. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140915120742</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ohtani T, Kurihara H, Ishiuchi S, Saito N, Oriuchi N, Inoue T, Sasaki T. Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001; 28(11): 1664–70. DOI: 10.1007/s002590100620</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ohtani T, Kurihara H, Ishiuchi S, Saito N, Oriuchi N, Inoue T, Sasaki T. Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001; 28(11): 1664–70. DOI: 10.1007/s002590100620</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sollini M, Sghedoni R, Erba PA, Cavuto S, Froio A, De Berti G, et al. Diagnostic performances of [18f]fluorocholine positron emission tomography in brain tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 62(2): 209–19. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.02807-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sollini M, Sghedoni R, Erba PA, Cavuto S, Froio A, De Berti G, et al. Diagnostic performances of [18f]fluorocholine positron emission tomography in brain tumors. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 62(2): 209–19. doi: 10.23736/S1824-4785.17.02807-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kobayashi H, Hirata K, Yamaguchi S, Terasaka S, Shiga T, Houkin K. Usefulness of FMISO-PET for glioma analysis. Neurol Med Chir. 2013; 53(11): 773–8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra2013-0256</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kobayashi H, Hirata K, Yamaguchi S, Terasaka S, Shiga T, Houkin K. Usefulness of FMISO-PET for glioma analysis. Neurol Med Chir. 2013; 53(11): 773–8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra2013-0256</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hirata K, Terasaka S, Shiga T, Hattori N, Magota K, Kobayashi H, et al. [18F]-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malig nant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(5): 760–70. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2037-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hirata K, Terasaka S, Shiga T, Hattori N, Magota K, Kobayashi H, et al. [18F]-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malig nant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(5): 760–70. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2037-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Winkeler A, Boisgard R, Awde AR, Dubois A, Thézé B, Zheng J, et al. The translocator protein ligand [18F]DPA-714 images glioma and activated microglia in vivo. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(5): 811–23. doi: 10.1007%2Fs00259- 011-2041-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Winkeler A, Boisgard R, Awde AR, Dubois A, Thézé B, Zheng J, et al. The translocator protein ligand [18F]DPA-714 images glioma and activated microglia in vivo. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(5): 811–23. doi: 10.1007%2Fs00259- 011-2041-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jensen P, Feng L, Law I, Svarer C, Knudsen GM, Mikkelsen JD, et al. TSPO imaging in glioblastoma multiforme: a direct comparison between 123I-CLINDE SPECT, 18F-FET PET, and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(9): 1386–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158998</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jensen P, Feng L, Law I, Svarer C, Knudsen GM, Mikkelsen JD, et al. TSPO imaging in glioblastoma multiforme: a direct comparison between 123I-CLINDE SPECT, 18F-FET PET, and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(9): 1386–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158998</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smits A, Baumert BG. The clinical value of PET with amino acid tracers for gliomas WHO grade II. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011; 2011: 372509. doi: 10.1155/2011/372509</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smits A, Baumert BG. The clinical value of PET with amino acid tracers for gliomas WHO grade II. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011; 2011: 372509. doi: 10.1155/2011/372509</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smits A, Westerberg E, Ribom D. Adding 11C-methionine PET to the EORTC prognostic factors in grade 2 gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(1): 65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0531-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smits A, Westerberg E, Ribom D. Adding 11C-methionine PET to the EORTC prognostic factors in grade 2 gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(1): 65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0531-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pauleit D, Stoffels G, Bachofner A, Floeth FW, Sabel M, Herzog H, et al. Comparison of(18)F-FET and(18)F-FDG PET in brain tumors. Nucl Med Biol. 2009; 36(7): 779–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pauleit D, Stoffels G, Bachofner A, Floeth FW, Sabel M, Herzog H, et al. Comparison of(18)F-FET and(18)F-FDG PET in brain tumors. Nucl Med Biol. 2009; 36(7): 779–87. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pirotte B, Goldman S, Massager N, David P, Wikler D, Lipszyc M, et al. Combined use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-methionine in 45 positron emission tomography-guided stereotactic brain biopsies. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101(3): 476–83. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0476</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pirotte B, Goldman S, Massager N, David P, Wikler D, Lipszyc M, et al. Combined use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-methionine in 45 positron emission tomography-guided stereotactic brain biopsies. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101(3): 476–83. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0476</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plotkin M, Blechschmidt C, Auf G, Nyuyki F, Geworski L, Denecke T, et al. Comparison of F-18 FET-PET with F-18 FDG-PET for biopsy planning of non-contrast-enhancing gliomas. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2496–502. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1819-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plotkin M, Blechschmidt C, Auf G, Nyuyki F, Geworski L, Denecke T, et al. Comparison of F-18 FET-PET with F-18 FDG-PET for biopsy planning of non-contrast-enhancing gliomas. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 2496–502. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1819-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Ruge MI, Rapp M, Sabel M, Reifenberger G, et al. Role of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET as a diagnostic tool for detection of malignant progression in patients with low-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2013; 54(12): 2046–54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123836</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Ruge MI, Rapp M, Sabel M, Reifenberger G, et al. Role of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET as a diagnostic tool for detection of malignant progression in patients with low-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2013; 54(12): 2046–54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123836</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jansen NL, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Todica A, Eigenbrod S, et al. Prognostic significance of dynamic 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed astrocytic high-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(1): 9–15. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.144675</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jansen NL, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Todica A, Eigenbrod S, et al. Prognostic significance of dynamic 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed astrocytic high-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(1): 9–15. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.144675</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Unterrainer M, Schweisthal F, Suchorska B, Wenter V, SchmidTannwald C, Fendler WP, et al. Serial 18F-FET P imaging of primarily 18F-FET-negative glioma – does it make sense? J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(8): 1177–82. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171033</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Unterrainer M, Schweisthal F, Suchorska B, Wenter V, SchmidTannwald C, Fendler WP, et al. Serial 18F-FET P imaging of primarily 18F-FET-negative glioma – does it make sense? J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(8): 1177–82. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171033</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit63"><label>63</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, Jacobs AH, Voges J, Hoevels M, et al. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(21): 7163–70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0262</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, Jacobs AH, Voges J, Hoevels M, et al. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(21): 7163–70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0262</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit64"><label>64</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lopez WO, Cordeiro JG, Albicker U, Doostkam S, Nikkhah G, Kirch RD, et al. Correlation of(18)F-fluoroethyl tyrosine positronemission tomography uptake values and histomorphological findings by stereotactic serial biopsy in newly diagnosed brain tumors using a refined software tool. Onco Targets Ther. 2015; 8: 3803–15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S87126</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopez WO, Cordeiro JG, Albicker U, Doostkam S, Nikkhah G, Kirch RD, et al. Correlation of(18)F-fluoroethyl tyrosine positronemission tomography uptake values and histomorphological findings by stereotactic serial biopsy in newly diagnosed brain tumors using a refined software tool. Onco Targets Ther. 2015; 8: 3803–15. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S87126</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit65"><label>65</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mosskin M, Ericson K, Hindmarsh T, von Holst H, Collins VP, Bergström M, et al. Positron emission tomography compared with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in supratentorial gliomas using multiple stereotactic biopsies as reference. Acta Radiol. 1989; 30(3): 225–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mosskin M, Ericson K, Hindmarsh T, von Holst H, Collins VP, Bergström M, et al. Positron emission tomography compared with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in supratentorial gliomas using multiple stereotactic biopsies as reference. Acta Radiol. 1989; 30(3): 225–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit66"><label>66</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, Müller HW, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L- tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005; 128(3): 678–87. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh399</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, Müller HW, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L- tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005; 128(3): 678–87. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh399</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit67"><label>67</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pirotte BJ, Levivier M, Goldman S, Massager N, Wikler D, Dewitte O, et al. Positron emission tomography-guided volumetric resection of supratentorial high-grade gliomas: a survival analysis in 66 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(3): 471–81. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338949.94496.85</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pirotte BJ, Levivier M, Goldman S, Massager N, Wikler D, Dewitte O, et al. Positron emission tomography-guided volumetric resection of supratentorial high-grade gliomas: a survival analysis in 66 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(3): 471–81. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000338949.94496.85</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit68"><label>68</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buchmann N, Klasner B, Gempt J, Bauer JS, Pyka T, Delbridge C, et al. (18)F-fluoroethyl-l-thyrosine positron emission tomography to delineate tumor residuals after glioblastoma resection: a comparison with standard postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg. 2016; 89: 420–6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buchmann N, Klasner B, Gempt J, Bauer JS, Pyka T, Delbridge C, et al. (18)F-fluoroethyl-l-thyrosine positron emission tomography to delineate tumor residuals after glioblastoma resection: a comparison with standard postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg. 2016; 89: 420–6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit69"><label>69</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piroth MD, Holy R, Pinkawa M, Stoffels G, Kaiser HJ, Galldiks N, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative, pre-irradiation(18)Ffluoroethyl-l-tyrosine uptake in glioblastoma patients treated with radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2011; 99(2): 218–24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piroth MD, Holy R, Pinkawa M, Stoffels G, Kaiser HJ, Galldiks N, et al. Prognostic impact of postoperative, pre-irradiation(18)Ffluoroethyl-l-tyrosine uptake in glioblastoma patients treated with radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2011; 99(2): 218–24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit70"><label>70</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suchorska B, Jansen NL, Linn J, Kretzschmar H, Janssen H, Eigenbrod S, et al. Biological tumor volume in 18FET-PET before radiochemotherapy correlates with survival in GBM. Neurology. 2015; 84(7): 710–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001262</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suchorska B, Jansen NL, Linn J, Kretzschmar H, Janssen H, Eigenbrod S, et al. Biological tumor volume in 18FET-PET before radiochemotherapy correlates with survival in GBM. Neurology. 2015; 84(7): 710–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001262</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit71"><label>71</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grosu AL, Weber WA. PET for radiation treatment planning of brain tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 96(3): 325–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grosu AL, Weber WA. PET for radiation treatment planning of brain tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2010; 96(3): 325–7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit72"><label>72</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosenschold PM, Costa J, Engelholm SA, Lundemann MJ, Law I, Ohlhues L, Engelholm S. Impact of [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine PET imaging on target definition for radiation therapy of highgrade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(5): 757–63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou316</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosenschold PM, Costa J, Engelholm SA, Lundemann MJ, Law I, Ohlhues L, Engelholm S. Impact of [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine PET imaging on target definition for radiation therapy of highgrade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(5): 757–63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou316</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit73"><label>73</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piroth MD, Pinkawa M, Holy R, Klotz J, Schaar S, Stoffels G, et al. Integrated boost IMRT with FET-PET-adapted local dose escalation in glioblastomas. Results of a prospective phase II study. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012; 188(4): 334–9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0060-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piroth MD, Pinkawa M, Holy R, Klotz J, Schaar S, Stoffels G, et al. Integrated boost IMRT with FET-PET-adapted local dose escalation in glioblastomas. Results of a prospective phase II study. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012; 188(4): 334–9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0060-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit74"><label>74</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levivier M, Massager N, Wikler D, Lorenzoni J, Ruiz S, Devriendt D, et al. Use of stereotactic PET images in dosimetry planning of radiosurgery for brain tumors: clinical experience and proposed classification. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(7): 1146–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levivier M, Massager N, Wikler D, Lorenzoni J, Ruiz S, Devriendt D, et al. Use of stereotactic PET images in dosimetry planning of radiosurgery for brain tumors: clinical experience and proposed classification. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(7): 1146–54.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit75"><label>75</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rickhey M, Koelbl O, Eilles C, Bogner L. A biologically adapted dose-escalation approach, demonstrated for 18F-FET- PET in brain tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008; 184(10): 536–42. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1883-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rickhey M, Koelbl O, Eilles C, Bogner L. A biologically adapted dose-escalation approach, demonstrated for 18F-FET- PET in brain tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. 2008; 184(10): 536–42. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1883-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit76"><label>76</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rieken S, Habermehl D, Giesel FL, Hoffmann C, Burger U, Rief H, et al. Analysis of FET-PET imaging for target volume definition in patients with gliomas treated with conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 109(3): 487–92. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.043</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rieken S, Habermehl D, Giesel FL, Hoffmann C, Burger U, Rief H, et al. Analysis of FET-PET imaging for target volume definition in patients with gliomas treated with conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 109(3): 487–92. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.043</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit77"><label>77</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weber DC, Zilli T, Buchegger F, Casanova N, Haller G, Rouzaud M, et al. [(18)F]Fluoroethyltyrosine-positron emission tomographyguided radiotherapy for high-grade glioma. Radiat Oncol. 2008; 3: 44. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-44</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weber DC, Zilli T, Buchegger F, Casanova N, Haller G, Rouzaud M, et al. [(18)F]Fluoroethyltyrosine-positron emission tomographyguided radiotherapy for high-grade glioma. Radiat Oncol. 2008; 3: 44. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-3-44</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit78"><label>78</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2016; 18(3): 426–34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov148</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2016; 18(3): 426–34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov148</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit79"><label>79</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manabe O, Hattori N, Yamaguchi S, Hirata K, Kobayaxhi K, Terasaka S, et al. Oligodendroglial component complicates the prediction of tumour grading with metabolic imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(6): 896–904. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-2996-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manabe O, Hattori N, Yamaguchi S, Hirata K, Kobayaxhi K, Terasaka S, et al. Oligodendroglial component complicates the prediction of tumour grading with metabolic imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(6): 896–904. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-2996-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit80"><label>80</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pöpperl G, Kreth FW, Mehrkens JH, Herms J, Seelos K, Koch W, et al. FET PET for the evaluation of untreated gliomas: correlation of FET uptake and uptake kinetics with tumour grading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12): 1933–42. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0534-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pöpperl G, Kreth FW, Mehrkens JH, Herms J, Seelos K, Koch W, et al. FET PET for the evaluation of untreated gliomas: correlation of FET uptake and uptake kinetics with tumour grading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007; 34(12): 1933–42. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0534-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit81"><label>81</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stockhammer F, Plotkin M, Amthauer H, van Landeghem FK, Woiciechowsky C. Correlation of F-18-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosin uptake with vascular and cell density in non-contrast-enhancing gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2008; 88(2): 205–10. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9551-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stockhammer F, Plotkin M, Amthauer H, van Landeghem FK, Woiciechowsky C. Correlation of F-18-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosin uptake with vascular and cell density in non-contrast-enhancing gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2008; 88(2): 205–10. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9551-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit82"><label>82</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wyss MT, Hofer S, Hefti M, Bärtschi E, Uhlmann C, Treyer V, Roelcke U. Spatial heterogeneity of low-grade gliomas at the capillary level: a PET study on tumor blood flow and amino acid uptake. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(7): 1047–52. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038489</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wyss MT, Hofer S, Hefti M, Bärtschi E, Uhlmann C, Treyer V, Roelcke U. Spatial heterogeneity of low-grade gliomas at the capillary level: a PET study on tumor blood flow and amino acid uptake. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(7): 1047–52. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.038489</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit83"><label>83</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скворцова Т.Ю., Захс Д.В., Гурчин А.Ф. ПЭТ с [11С]-метионином в диагностике глиальных опухолей головного мозга. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина. 2016; 27(4): 61–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skvortsova TYu, Zakhs DV, Gurchin AF. PET using [11C]methionine for assessment of cerebral gliomas. Journal of Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center. 2016: 27(4): 61–9 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit84"><label>84</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Calcagni ML, Galli G, Giordano A, Taralli S, Anile C, Niesen A, et al. Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine(F-18 FET) PET for glioma grading: assessment of individual probability of malignancy. Clin Nucl Med. 2011; 36(10): 841–7. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182291b40</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calcagni ML, Galli G, Giordano A, Taralli S, Anile C, Niesen A, et al. Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine(F-18 FET) PET for glioma grading: assessment of individual probability of malignancy. Clin Nucl Med. 2011; 36(10): 841–7. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182291b40</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit85"><label>85</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weckesser M, Langen KJ, Rickert CH, Kloska S, Straeter R, Hamacher K, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluorethyl)-L-tyrosine PET in the clinical evaluation of primary brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005; 32(4): 422–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1705-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weckesser M, Langen KJ, Rickert CH, Kloska S, Straeter R, Hamacher K, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluorethyl)-L-tyrosine PET in the clinical evaluation of primary brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005; 32(4): 422–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1705-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit86"><label>86</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albert NL, Winkelmann I, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Mille E, et al. Early static(18)F-FET-PET scans have a higher accuracy for glioma grading than the standard 20-40 min scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(6): 1105–14. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3276-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Albert NL, Winkelmann I, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Mille E, et al. Early static(18)F-FET-PET scans have a higher accuracy for glioma grading than the standard 20-40 min scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(6): 1105–14. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3276-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit87"><label>87</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Kracht LW, Vollmar S, Jacobs AH, Fink GR, et al. Volumetry of [(1)(1)C]-methionine positron emission tomographic uptake as a prognostic marker before treatment of patients with malignant glioma. Mol Imaging. 2012; 11(6): 516–27. doi: 10.2310/7290.2012.00022</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Kracht LW, Vollmar S, Jacobs AH, Fink GR, et al. Volumetry of [(1)(1)C]-methionine positron emission tomographic uptake as a prognostic marker before treatment of patients with malignant glioma. Mol Imaging. 2012; 11(6): 516–27. doi: 10.2310/7290.2012.00022</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit88"><label>88</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pyka T, Gempt J, Hiob D, Ringel F, Schlegel J, Bette S, et al. Textural analysis of pre-therapeutic [18F]-FET-PET and its correlation with tumor grade and patient survival in high-grade gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(1): 133–41. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3140-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pyka T, Gempt J, Hiob D, Ringel F, Schlegel J, Bette S, et al. Textural analysis of pre-therapeutic [18F]-FET-PET and its correlation with tumor grade and patient survival in high-grade gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(1): 133–41. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3140-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit89"><label>89</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ribom D, Eriksson A, Hartman M, Engler H, Nilsson A, Långström B, et al. Positron emission tomography(11)C- methionine and survival in patients with low-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2001; 92(6): 1541–49. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010915)92: 6&lt;1541: : AID-CNCR1480&gt;3.0.CO; 2-D</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ribom D, Eriksson A, Hartman M, Engler H, Nilsson A, Långström B, et al. Positron emission tomography(11)C- methionine and survival in patients with low-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2001; 92(6): 1541–49. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010915)92: 6&lt;1541: : AID-CNCR1480&gt;3.0.CO; 2-D</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit90"><label>90</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Floeth FW, Pauleit D, Sabel M, Stoffels G, Reifenberger G, Riemenschneider MJ, et al. Prognostic value of O-(2-18Ffluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and MRI in low-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48: 519-27. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037895</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Floeth FW, Pauleit D, Sabel M, Stoffels G, Reifenberger G, Riemenschneider MJ, et al. Prognostic value of O-(2-18Ffluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and MRI in low-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48: 519-27. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.037895</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit91"><label>91</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jansen NL, Graute V, Armbruster L, Suchorska B, Lutz J, Eigenbrod S, et al. MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(6): 1021–29. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2109-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jansen NL, Graute V, Armbruster L, Suchorska B, Lutz J, Eigenbrod S, et al. MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012; 39(6): 1021–29. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2109-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit92"><label>92</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kunz M, Thon N, Eigenbrod S, Hartmann C, Egensperger R, Herms J, et al. Hot spots in dynamic(18)FET-PET delineate malignant tumor parts within suspected WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2011; 13(3): 307–16. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq196</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kunz M, Thon N, Eigenbrod S, Hartmann C, Egensperger R, Herms J, et al. Hot spots in dynamic(18)FET-PET delineate malignant tumor parts within suspected WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2011; 13(3): 307–16. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq196</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit93"><label>93</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thon N, Kunz M, Lemke L, Jansen NL, Eigenbrod S, Kreth S, et al. Dynamic F-FET PET in suspected WHO grade II gliomas defines distinct biological subgroups with different clinical courses. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136(9): 2132–45. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29259</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thon N, Kunz M, Lemke L, Jansen NL, Eigenbrod S, Kreth S, et al. Dynamic F-FET PET in suspected WHO grade II gliomas defines distinct biological subgroups with different clinical courses. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136(9): 2132–45. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29259</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit94"><label>94</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for highgrade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11): 1963–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for highgrade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(11): 1963–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit95"><label>95</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Santra A, Kumar R, Sharma P, Bal C, Kumar A, Julka PK, et al. F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with recurrent glioma: comparison with contrast enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(3): 508–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.080</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Santra A, Kumar R, Sharma P, Bal C, Kumar A, Julka PK, et al. F-18 FDG PET-CT in patients with recurrent glioma: comparison with contrast enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(3): 508–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.080</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit96"><label>96</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tripathi M, Sharma R, Varshney R, Jaimini A, Jain J, Souza MM, et al. Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 methionine PET/CT for the evaluation of recurrent primary brain tumors. Clin Nucl Med. 2012; 37(2): 158–63. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318238f51a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tripathi M, Sharma R, Varshney R, Jaimini A, Jain J, Souza MM, et al. Comparison of F-18 FDG and C-11 methionine PET/CT for the evaluation of recurrent primary brain tumors. Clin Nucl Med. 2012; 37(2): 158–63. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318238f51a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit97"><label>97</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Minamimoto R, Saginoya T, Kondo C, Tomura N, Ito K, Matsuo Y, et al. Differentiation of brain tumor recurrence from post-radiotherapy necrosis with 11C-Methionine PET: visual assessment versus quantitative assessment. PloS ONE. 2015; 10(7): e0132515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132515</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minamimoto R, Saginoya T, Kondo C, Tomura N, Ito K, Matsuo Y, et al. Differentiation of brain tumor recurrence from post-radiotherapy necrosis with 11C-Methionine PET: visual assessment versus quantitative assessment. PloS ONE. 2015; 10(7): e0132515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132515</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit98"><label>98</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nihashi T, Dahabreh IJ, Terasawa T. Diagnostic accuracy of PET for recurrent glioma diagnosis: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neurorad. 2013; 34(5): 944–50. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3324</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nihashi T, Dahabreh IJ, Terasawa T. Diagnostic accuracy of PET for recurrent glioma diagnosis: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neurorad. 2013; 34(5): 944–50. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3324</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit99"><label>99</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Higashiyama S, Takami T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5): 694–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048082</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Terakawa Y, Tsuyuguchi N, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Higashiyama S, Takami T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine PET for differentiation of recurrent brain tumors from radiation necrosis after radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5): 694–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048082</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit100"><label>100</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скворцова Т.Ю., Бродская З.Л., Гурчин А.Ф., Савинцева Ж.И. Диагностическая точность ПЭТ с [11С]метионином</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skvortsova TYu, Brodskaya ZL, Gurchin AF, Savintseva ZhI. Diagnostic accuracy of PET using [11C]methionine in differential diagnosis of primary brain tumor recurrence from radiation-induced brain injury. Medical Visualization. 2011; 6: 80–92 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit101"><label>101</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">в разграничении продолженного роста первичных церебральных опухолей и лучевых поражений головного мозга. Медицинская визуализация. 2011; 6: 80–92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salber D, Stoffels G, Pauleit D, Reifenberger G, Sabel M, Shah NJ, et al. Differential uptake of [18F]FET and [3H]L-methionine in focal cortical ischemia. Nucl Med Biol. 2006; 33(8): 1029–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.09.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit102"><label>102</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salber D, Stoffels G, Pauleit D, Reifenberger G, Sabel M, Shah NJ, et al. Differential uptake of [18F]FET and [3H]L-methionine in focal cortical ischemia. Nucl Med Biol. 2006; 33(8): 1029–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.09.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salber D, Stoffels G, Pauleit D, Oros-Peusquens AM, Shah NJ, Klauth P, et al. Differential uptake of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine, L-3H-methionine, and 3H-deoxyglucose in brain abscesses. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(12): 2056–62. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.046615</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit103"><label>103</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salber D, Stoffels G, Pauleit D, Oros-Peusquens AM, Shah NJ, Klauth P, et al. Differential uptake of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine, L-3H-methionine, and 3H-deoxyglucose in brain abscesses. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(12): 2056–62. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.046615</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Stoffels G, Hutterer M, Rapp M, Sabel M, et al. Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(5): 685–95. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2959-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit104"><label>104</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Stoffels G, Hutterer M, Rapp M, Sabel M, et al. Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(5): 685–95. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2959-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karunanithi S, Sharma P, Kumar A, Khangembam BC, Bandopadhyaya GP, Kumar R, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 40(7): 1025–35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2384-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit105"><label>105</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Karunanithi S, Sharma P, Kumar A, Khangembam BC, Bandopadhyaya GP, Kumar R, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 40(7): 1025–35. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2384-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popperl G, Gotz C, Rachinger W, Gildehaus FJ, Tonn JC, Tatsch K. Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)- L-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004; 31(11): 1464–70. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1590-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit106"><label>106</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popperl G, Gotz C, Rachinger W, Gildehaus FJ, Tonn JC, Tatsch K. Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)- L-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004; 31(11): 1464–70. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1590-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsuyuguchi N, Sunada I, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Tanaka K, Takami T, et al. Methionine positron emission tomography of recurrent metastatic brain tumor and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery: is a differential diagnosis possible? J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(5): 1056–64. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1056</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit107"><label>107</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsuyuguchi N, Sunada I, Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Tanaka K, Takami T, et al. Methionine positron emission tomography of recurrent metastatic brain tumor and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery: is a differential diagnosis possible? J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(5): 1056–64. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1056</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss CP, Piroth MD, Sabel M, Ruge MI, et al. Role of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for differentiation of local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation necrosis. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(9): 1367–74. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103325</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit108"><label>108</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss CP, Piroth MD, Sabel M, Ruge MI, et al. Role of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for differentiation of local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation necrosis. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(9): 1367–74. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.103325</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lizarraga KJ, Allen-Auerbach M, Czernin J, DeSalles AA, Yong WH, Phelps ME, et al. (18)F-FDOPA PET for differentiating recurrent or progressive brain metastatic tumors from late or delayed radiation injury after radiation treatment. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55(1): 30–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121418</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit109"><label>109</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lizarraga KJ, Allen-Auerbach M, Czernin J, DeSalles AA, Yong WH, Phelps ME, et al. (18)F-FDOPA PET for differentiating recurrent or progressive brain metastatic tumors from late or delayed radiation injury after radiation treatment. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55(1): 30–6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.121418</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cicone F, Minniti G, Romano A, Papa A, Scaringi C, Tavanti F, et al. Accuracy of F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive brain metastases after radiosurgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(1): 103–11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2886-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit110"><label>110</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cicone F, Minniti G, Romano A, Papa A, Scaringi C, Tavanti F, et al. Accuracy of F-DOPA PET and perfusion-MRI for differentiating radionecrotic from progressive brain metastases after radiosurgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(1): 103–11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2886-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skvortsova TYu, Brodskaya ZL, Savintseva ZhI, Gurchin AF. Imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment gliomas and opportunities to improve the accuracy of diagnosis using PET with [11C]methionine. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2014: 5(2): 5–16 (in Russian). doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-2-5-16</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit111"><label>111</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скворцова Т.Ю., Бродская З.Л., Савинцева Ж.И., Гурчин А.Ф. Современные проблемы мониторинга лечения церебральных глиом и возможности повышения точности диагностики при ПЭТ с 11С-метионином. Лучевая диагностика и терапия. 2014; 5(2): 5–16. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2014-2-5-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Langen K, Holy R, Pinkawa M, Stoffels G, Nolte KW, et al. Assessment of treatment response in patients with glioblastoma using [18F]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET in comparison to MRI. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(7): 1048–57. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098590</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit112"><label>112</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Langen K, Holy R, Pinkawa M, Stoffels G, Nolte KW, et al. Assessment of treatment response in patients with glioblastoma using [18F]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET in comparison to MRI. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(7): 1048–57. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098590</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piroth MD, Pinkawa M, Holy R, Klotz J, Nussen S, Stoffels G, et al. Prognostic value of early [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine positron emission tomography after radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80(1): 176–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.055</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit113"><label>113</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piroth MD, Pinkawa M, Holy R, Klotz J, Nussen S, Stoffels G, et al. Prognostic value of early [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine positron emission tomography after radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 80(1): 176–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.055</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popperl G, Goldbrunner R, Gildehaus FJ, Kreth FW, Tanner P, Holtmannspötter M, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of convection-enhanced delivery of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005; 32(9): 1018–25. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1819-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit114"><label>114</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popperl G, Goldbrunner R, Gildehaus FJ, Kreth FW, Tanner P, Holtmannspötter M, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of convection-enhanced delivery of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005; 32(9): 1018–25. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1819-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pöpperl G, Götz C, Rachinger W, Schnell O, Gildehaus FJ, Tonn JC, et al. Serial O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(7): 792–800. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0053-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit115"><label>115</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pöpperl G, Götz C, Rachinger W, Schnell O, Gildehaus FJ, Tonn JC, et al. Serial O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for monitoring the effects of intracavitary radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(7): 792–800. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0053-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, Ullrich RT, Backes H, Brunn A, et al. Patient-tailored, imaging-guided, long-term temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. Mol Imaging. 2010; 9(1): 40–6. doi: 10.2310/7290.2010.00002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit116"><label>116</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, Ullrich RT, Backes H, Brunn A, et al. Patient-tailored, imaging-guided, long-term temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. Mol Imaging. 2010; 9(1): 40–6. doi: 10.2310/7290.2010.00002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, Thomas A, Jacobs AH, Heiss WD, et al. Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl.Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(5): 516–24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0002-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit117"><label>117</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Kracht LW, Burghaus L, Thomas A, Jacobs AH, Heiss WD, et al. Use of 11C-methionine PET to monitor the effects of temozolomide chemotherapy in malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl.Med Mol Imaging. 2006; 33(5): 516–24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0002-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galldiks N, Filss CP, Goldbrunner R, Langen KJ. Discrepant MR and [(18)F]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET imaging findings in a patient with bevacizumab failure. Case Rep Oncol. 2012; 5(3): 490–4. doi: 10.1159/000342480</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit118"><label>118</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Galldiks N, Filss CP, Goldbrunner R, Langen KJ. Discrepant MR and [(18)F]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET imaging findings in a patient with bevacizumab failure. Case Rep Oncol. 2012; 5(3): 490–4. doi: 10.1159/000342480</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hutterer M, Nowosielski M, Putzer D, Waitz D, Tinkhauser G, Kostron H, et al. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET predicts failure of antiangiogenic treatment in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(6): 856–64. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086645</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit119"><label>119</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hutterer M, Nowosielski M, Putzer D, Waitz D, Tinkhauser G, Kostron H, et al. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET predicts failure of antiangiogenic treatment in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(6): 856–64. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086645</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schwarzenberg J, Czernin J, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM, Pope WB, Grogan T, et al. Treatment response evaluation using 18F-FDOPA PET in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on bevacizumab therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(13): 3550–59. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1440</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit120"><label>120</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schwarzenberg J, Czernin J, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM, Pope WB, Grogan T, et al. Treatment response evaluation using 18F-FDOPA PET in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on bevacizumab therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(13): 3550–59. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1440</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gneveckow U, Jordan A, Scholz R, Brüss V, Waldöfner N, Ricke J, et al. Description and characterization of the novel hyperthermia- and thermoablation-system MFH 300F for clinical magnetic fluid hyperthermia. Med Phys. 2004; 31(6): 1444– 51. doi: 10.1118/1.1748629</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit121"><label>121</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gneveckow U, Jordan A, Scholz R, Brüss V, Waldöfner N, Ricke J, et al. Description and characterization of the novel hyperthermia- and thermoablation-system MFH 300F for clinical magnetic fluid hyperthermia. Med Phys. 2004; 31(6): 1444– 51. doi: 10.1118/1.1748629</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plotkin M, Gneveckow U, Meier-Hauff K, Amthauer H, Feussner A, Denecke T, et al. 18F-FET PET for planning of thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles in recurrent glioblastomas. Int J Hyperthermia. 2006; 22(4): 319–25. doi: 10.1080/02656730600734128</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit122"><label>122</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plotkin M, Gneveckow U, Meier-Hauff K, Amthauer H, Feussner A, Denecke T, et al. 18F-FET PET for planning of thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles in recurrent glioblastomas. Int J Hyperthermia. 2006; 22(4): 319–25. doi: 10.1080/02656730600734128</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herholz K, Coope D, Jackson A. Metabolic and molecular imaging in neuro-oncology. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6(8): 711–24. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70192-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit123"><label>123</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herholz K, Coope D, Jackson A. Metabolic and molecular imaging in neuro-oncology. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6(8): 711–24. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70192-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dhermain FG, Hau P, Lanfermann H, Jacobs AH, van den Bent MJ. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(9): 906–20. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70181-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit124"><label>124</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dhermain FG, Hau P, Lanfermann H, Jacobs AH, van den Bent MJ. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(9): 906–20. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70181-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pauleit D, Langen KJ, Floeth F, Hautzel H, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, et al. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient be used as a noninvasive parameter to distinguish tumor tissue from peritumoral tissue in cerebral gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(5): 758–64. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20177</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit125"><label>125</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pauleit D, Langen KJ, Floeth F, Hautzel H, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, et al. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient be used as a noninvasive parameter to distinguish tumor tissue from peritumoral tissue in cerebral gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20(5): 758–64. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20177</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stadlbauer A, Prante O, Nimsky C, Salomonowitz E, Buchfelder M, Kuwert T, et al. Metabolic imaging of cerebral gliomas: spatial correlation of changes in O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5): 721–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049213</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit126"><label>126</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stadlbauer A, Prante O, Nimsky C, Salomonowitz E, Buchfelder M, Kuwert T, et al. Metabolic imaging of cerebral gliomas: spatial correlation of changes in O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5): 721–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049213</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stadlbauer A, Prante O, Nimsky C, Salomonowitz E, Buchfelder M, Kuwert T, et al. Metabolic imaging of cerebral gliomas: spatial correlation of changes in O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5): 721–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049213</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
