rentradВестник рентгенологии и радиологииJournal of radiology and nuclear medicine0042-46762619-0478Limited Liability Company "LUCHEVAYA DIAGNOSTIKA", Russian Association of Radiologists10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-3-164-170rentrad-358Research ArticleОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWS OF LITERATUREСОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ ПРИ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИИ ОСТРОГО ПАНКРЕАТИТАTHE MODERN POSSIBILITIES OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE VISUALIZATION OF ACUTE PANCREATITIShttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-6513ЛитвинА. А.LitvinA. A.

ул. А. Невского, 14, Калининград, 236016, Российская Федерация

д. м. н., профессор кафедры хирургических дисциплин

ul. A. Nevskogo, 14, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation

Dr. Med. Sc., Professor of Chair of Surgical Disciplines

alitvin@kantiana.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-2018КнязеваЕ. Г.KnyazevaE. G.

ул. А. Невского, 14, Калининград, 236016, Российская Федерация

ведущий менеджер

ul. A. Nevskogo, 14, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation

Leading Manager

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-4707ФилатовА. А.FilatovA. A.

ул. Братьев Лизюковых, 5, Гомель, 246029, Республика Беларусь

врач-хирург

ul. Brat’ev Lizyukovykh, 5, Gomel, 246029, Republic of Belarus

Surgeon

ФГАОУ ВО «Балтийский федеральный университет им. И. Канта»РоссияImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityRussian FederationГомельская областная клиническая больницаБеларусьGomel Regional Clinical HospitalBelarus201827072018993164170Copyright © Литвин А.А., Князева Е.Г., Филатов А.А., 20182018Литвин А.А., Князева Е.Г., Филатов А.А.Litvin A.A., Knyazeva E.G., Filatov A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.russianradiology.ru/jour/article/view/358

Компьютерная томография (КТ) с болюсным контрастным усилением является основным методом объективизации патологии поджелудочной железы при панкреонекрозе. Это связано с достаточно высокой диагностической точностью, хорошей доступностью метода, небольшим временем сканирования, простой интерпретацией получаемых изображений. На современном этапе перфузионная КТ поджелудочной железы, пространственное моделирование цифровых изображений, определение анизотропии ткани поджелудочной железы позволяют улучшить диагностическую эффективность КТ у пациентов с острым панкреатитом.

Computed tomography (CT) with bolus contrast enhancement is the  main method of objectifying pancreatic pathology in pancreatic necrosis.  This is due to sufficiently high diagnostic accuracy, good  accessibility of the method, fast scanning time, simple interpretation of  the resulting images. At the present stage, perfusion CT of the  pancreas, threedimensional modeling of digital images, determination of anisotropy of pancreatic tissue allow improving the diagnostic efficiency of CT in patients with acute pancreatitis.

острый панкреатитпанкреонекроздиагностикавизуализациякомпьютерная томографияобзорacute pancreatitispancreatic necrosisdiagnosisvisualizationсomputed tomographyreviewReferencesЕрмолов А.С., Иванов П.А., Благовестнов Д.А., Гришин А.А. Диагностика и лечение острого панкреатита. М.: ВИДАР; 2013. [Ermolov A.S., Ivanov P.A., Blagovestnov D.A., Grishin A.A. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Moscow: VIDAR; 2013 (in Russ.).]Ермолов А.С., Иванов П.А., Благовестнов Д.А., Гришин А.А. Диагностика и лечение острого панкреатита. М.: ВИДАР; 2013. [Ermolov A.S., Ivanov P.A., Blagovestnov D.A., Grishin A.A. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis. Moscow: VIDAR; 2013 (in Russ.).]Beger H.G., Buchler M. Acute pancreatitis: research and clinical management. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.Beger H.G., Buchler M. Acute pancreatitis: research and clinical management. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. April 2008. Available at: http://pancreasclub.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/11/AtlantaClassification.pdf (accessed April 30, 2017).Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. April 2008. Available at: http://pancreasclub.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/11/AtlantaClassification.pdf (accessed April 30, 2017).Banks P.A., Bollen T.L., Dervenis C., Gooszen H.G., Johnson C.D., Sarr M.G. et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis – 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62 (1): 102–11. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779Banks P.A., Bollen T.L., Dervenis C., Gooszen H.G., Johnson C.D., Sarr M.G. et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis – 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62 (1): 102–11. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779Busireddy K.K., Al Obaidy M., Ramalho M., Kalubowila J., Baodong L., Santagostino I. et al. Pancreatitisimaging approach. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 2014; 5 (3): 252–70. DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.252Busireddy K.K., Al Obaidy M., Ramalho M., Kalubowila J., Baodong L., Santagostino I. et al. Pancreatitisimaging approach. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 2014; 5 (3): 252–70. DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.252Thoeni R.F. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology. 2012; 262 (3): 751–64. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110947Thoeni R.F. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment. Radiology. 2012; 262 (3): 751–64. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110947Касаткина Е.А., Klauss M., Kauczor H.-U., Ридэн Т.В., Hackert T., Синицын В.Е., Grenacher L. Возможности компьютерной томографии в оценке полиморфных изменений при деструктивных панкреатитах. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2014; 5: 34–9. DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-5-34-39Касаткина Е.А., Klauss M., Kauczor H.-U., Ридэн Т.В., Hackert T., Синицын В.Е., Grenacher L. Возможности компьютерной томографии в оценке полиморфных изменений при деструктивных панкреатитах. Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии. 2014; 5: 34–9. DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-5-34-39[Kasatkina E.A., Klauss M., Kauczor H.-U., Riden T.V., Hackert T., Sinitsyn V.E., Grenacher L. Capabilities of computed tomography to evaluate polymorphic changes in destructive pancreatitis. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2014; 5: 34–9. DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-5-34-39 (in Russ.).][Kasatkina E.A., Klauss M., Kauczor H.-U., Riden T.V., Hackert T., Sinitsyn V.E., Grenacher L. Capabilities of computed tomography to evaluate polymorphic changes in destructive pancreatitis. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2014; 5: 34–9. DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-5-34-39 (in Russ.).]Megibow A.J., Ralls P.W., Balfe D.M., Bree R.L., DiSantis D.J., Glick S.N. et al. Acute pancreatitis. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000; 215 (Suppl.): S203–7.Megibow A.J., Ralls P.W., Balfe D.M., Bree R.L., DiSantis D.J., Glick S.N. et al. Acute pancreatitis. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000; 215 (Suppl.): S203–7.Johnson C.D. Pancreatic disease: protocols and clinical research. N.Y.: CWI-S; 2009.Johnson C.D. Pancreatic disease: protocols and clinical research. N.Y.: CWI-S; 2009.Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13 (4, Suppl. 2): S1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013; 13 (4, Suppl. 2): S1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063Spitzer A.L., Thoeni R.F., Barcia A.M., Schell M.T., Harris H.W. Early nonenhanced abdominal computed tomography can predict mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2005; 9 (7): 928–33.Spitzer A.L., Thoeni R.F., Barcia A.M., Schell M.T., Harris H.W. Early nonenhanced abdominal computed tomography can predict mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2005; 9 (7): 928–33.Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J. Radiologic assessment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2007; 87 (6): 1341–58.Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J. Radiologic assessment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2007; 87 (6): 1341–58.Morgan D.E. Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008; 6 (10): 1077–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh. 2008.07.012Morgan D.E. Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008; 6 (10): 1077–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh. 2008.07.012Scaglione M., Casciani E., Pinto A., Andreoli C., De Vargas M., Gualdi G.F. Imaging assessment of acute pancreatitis: a review. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 2008; 29 (5): 322–40.Scaglione M., Casciani E., Pinto A., Andreoli C., De Vargas M., Gualdi G.F. Imaging assessment of acute pancreatitis: a review. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 2008; 29 (5): 322–40.Каган И.И., Железнов Л.М. Поджелудочная железа: микрохирургическая и компьютерно-томографическая анатомия. М.: Медицина; 2004. [Kagan I.I., Zheleznov L.M. Pancreas: microsurgical and computer tomography anatomy. Moscow: Meditsina; 2004 (in Russ.).]Каган И.И., Железнов Л.М. Поджелудочная железа: микрохирургическая и компьютерно-томографическая анатомия. М.: Медицина; 2004. [Kagan I.I., Zheleznov L.M. Pancreas: microsurgical and computer tomography anatomy. Moscow: Meditsina; 2004 (in Russ.).]Banks P.A., Freeman M.L. Practice parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101 (10): 2379–400.Banks P.A., Freeman M.L. Practice parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 101 (10): 2379–400.Arvanitakis M., Koustiani G., Gantzarou A., Grollios G., Tsitouridis I., Haritandi-Kouridou A. et al. Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging – a comparative study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2007; 39 (5): 473–82.Arvanitakis M., Koustiani G., Gantzarou A., Grollios G., Tsitouridis I., Haritandi-Kouridou A. et al. Staging of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging – a comparative study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2007; 39 (5): 473–82.Takahashi N., Papachristou G.I., Schmit G.D., Chahal P., LeRoy A.J., Sarr M.G. et al. CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18 (11): 2522–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1039-1Takahashi N., Papachristou G.I., Schmit G.D., Chahal P., LeRoy A.J., Sarr M.G. et al. CT findings of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN): differentiation from pseudocyst and prediction of outcome after endoscopic therapy. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18 (11): 2522–9. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1039-1Mujica V.R., Barkin J.S., Go V.L. Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Group Participants. Pancreas. 2000; 21 (4): 329–32.Mujica V.R., Barkin J.S., Go V.L. Acute pancreatitis secondary to pancreatic carcinoma. Study Group Participants. Pancreas. 2000; 21 (4): 329–32.Bollen T.L., Singh V.K., Maurer R., Repas K., van Es H.W., Banks P.A. et al. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011; 197 (2): 386–92. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4025Bollen T.L., Singh V.K., Maurer R., Repas K., van Es H.W., Banks P.A. et al. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011; 197 (2): 386–92. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4025De Waele J.J., Delrue L., Hoste E.A., De Vos M., Duyck P., Colardyn F.A. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas. 2007; 34 (2): 185–90.De Waele J.J., Delrue L., Hoste E.A., De Vos M., Duyck P., Colardyn F.A. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas. 2007; 34 (2): 185–90.Delrue L., Blanckaert P., Mertens D., Van Meerbeeck S., Ceelen W., Duyck P. Tissue perfusion in pathologies of the pancreas: assessment using 128-slice computed tomography. Abdom. Imaging. 2012; 37 (4): 595–601. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9783-0Delrue L., Blanckaert P., Mertens D., Van Meerbeeck S., Ceelen W., Duyck P. Tissue perfusion in pathologies of the pancreas: assessment using 128-slice computed tomography. Abdom. Imaging. 2012; 37 (4): 595–601. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9783-0Tsuji Y., Hamaguchi K., Watanabe Y., Okumura A., Isoda H., Yamamoto N. et al. Perfusion CT is superior to angiography in predicting pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 45 (11): 1155–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0267-8Tsuji Y., Hamaguchi K., Watanabe Y., Okumura A., Isoda H., Yamamoto N. et al. Perfusion CT is superior to angiography in predicting pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 45 (11): 1155–62. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0267-8Pieńkowska J., Gwoździewicz K., Skrobisz-Balandowska K., Marek I., Kostro J., Szurowska E. et al. Perfusion-CT – can we predict acute pancreatitis outcome within the first 24 hours from the onset of symptoms? PLoS One. 2016; 11 (1): e0146965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146965Pieńkowska J., Gwoździewicz K., Skrobisz-Balandowska K., Marek I., Kostro J., Szurowska E. et al. Perfusion-CT – can we predict acute pancreatitis outcome within the first 24 hours from the onset of symptoms? PLoS One. 2016; 11 (1): e0146965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146965Litvin A.A., Khokha D.V., Naser H., Filatov A.A. Value of three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic necrosis using contrast-enhanced CT data: initial results. Pancreatology. 2011; 11: 130.Litvin A.A., Khokha D.V., Naser H., Filatov A.A. Value of three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic necrosis using contrast-enhanced CT data: initial results. Pancreatology. 2011; 11: 130.Beger H.G., Warshaw A.L., Büchler M.W., Kozarek R.A., Lerch M.M., Neoptolemos J.P. et al. The pancreas: an integrated textbook of basic science, medicine, and surgery. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2009.Beger H.G., Warshaw A.L., Büchler M.W., Kozarek R.A., Lerch M.M., Neoptolemos J.P. et al. The pancreas: an integrated textbook of basic science, medicine, and surgery. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2009.Sureka B., Bansal K., Patidar Y., Arora A. Imaging lexicon for acute pancreatitis: 2012 Atlanta Classification revisited. Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf). 2016; 4 (1): 16–23. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov036Sureka B., Bansal K., Patidar Y., Arora A. Imaging lexicon for acute pancreatitis: 2012 Atlanta Classification revisited. Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf). 2016; 4 (1): 16–23. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov036Литвин А.А., Сурунович А.В., Юргель А.В. Использование трехмерной реконструкции КТ-данных для выбора хирургической тактики при инфицированном панкреонекрозе. Медицинская визуализация. 2008; 4: 127–32. [Litvin A.A., Surunovich A.V., Yurgel’ A.V. Using a three-dimensional reconstruction of CT data to select surgical tactics for infected pancreatic necrosis. Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya (Medical Imaging, Russian journal). 2008; 4: 127–32 (in Russ.).]Литвин А.А., Сурунович А.В., Юргель А.В. Использование трехмерной реконструкции КТ-данных для выбора хирургической тактики при инфицированном панкреонекрозе. Медицинская визуализация. 2008; 4: 127–32. [Litvin A.A., Surunovich A.V., Yurgel’ A.V. Using a three-dimensional reconstruction of CT data to select surgical tactics for infected pancreatic necrosis. Meditsinskaya Vizualizatsiya (Medical Imaging, Russian journal). 2008; 4: 127–32 (in Russ.).]Litvin A., Filatov A., Khokha D., Litvin V. Three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic necrosis using CT data. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2013; 8 (Suppl. 1): S360–61.Litvin A., Filatov A., Khokha D., Litvin V. Three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic necrosis using CT data. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2013; 8 (Suppl. 1): S360–61.Ковалев В.А. Анализ текстуры трехмерных медицинских изображений. Минск: Белорусская наука; 2008. [Kovalev V.A. Analysis of the texture of three-dimensional medical images. Minsk: Belorusskaya Nauka; 2008 (in Russ.).]Ковалев В.А. Анализ текстуры трехмерных медицинских изображений. Минск: Белорусская наука; 2008. [Kovalev V.A. Analysis of the texture of three-dimensional medical images. Minsk: Belorusskaya Nauka; 2008 (in Russ.).]Литвин А.А., Жариков О.Г., Филатов А.А., Ковалев В.А. Оценка анизотропии КТ- изображений в диагностике инфицированного панкреонекроза. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2013; 20 (3): 22–6. [Litvin A.A., Zharikov O.G., Filatov A.A., Kovalev V.A. Evaluation of anisotropy of CT images in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Vestnik Novykh Meditsinskikh Tekhnologiy (Bulletin of New Medical Technologies, Russian journal). 2013; 20 (3): 22–6 (in Russ.).]Литвин А.А., Жариков О.Г., Филатов А.А., Ковалев В.А. Оценка анизотропии КТ- изображений в диагностике инфицированного панкреонекроза. Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2013; 20 (3): 22–6. [Litvin A.A., Zharikov O.G., Filatov A.A., Kovalev V.A. Evaluation of anisotropy of CT images in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Vestnik Novykh Meditsinskikh Tekhnologiy (Bulletin of New Medical Technologies, Russian journal). 2013; 20 (3): 22–6 (in Russ.).]Foster B.R., Jensen K.K., Bakis G., Shaaban A.M., Coakley F.V. Revised Atlanta Classification for Acute Pancreatitis: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2016; 36 (3): 675–87. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150097Foster B.R., Jensen K.K., Bakis G., Shaaban A.M., Coakley F.V. Revised Atlanta Classification for Acute Pancreatitis: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2016; 36 (3): 675–87. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150097Murphy K.P., O'Connor O.J., Maher M.M. Updated imaging nomenclature for acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014; 203 (5): 464–9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12222Murphy K.P., O'Connor O.J., Maher M.M. Updated imaging nomenclature for acute pancreatitis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014; 203 (5): 464–9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12222

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.